Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 28;19(2):149-161.
doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2023.19.e32. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor

Affiliations
Review

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Acute Brain Injured Patients: When, How, What Should We Monitor

Youngbo Shim et al. Korean J Neurotrauma. .

Abstract

While there is no level I recommendation for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, it is typically indicated for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-8 (class II). Even for moderate TBI patients with GCS 9-12, ICP monitoring should be considered for risk of increased ICP. The impact of ICP monitoring on patient outcomes is still not well-established, but recent studies reported a reduction of early mortality (class III) in TBI patients. There is no standard protocol for the application of ICP monitoring. In cases where cerebrospinal fluid drainage is required, an external ventricular drain is commonly used. In other cases, parenchymal ICP monitoring devices are generally employed. Subdural or non-invasive forms are not suitable for ICP monitoring. The mean value of ICP is the parameter recommended for observation in many guidelines. In TBI, values above 22 mmHg are associated with increased mortality. However, recent studies proposed various parameters including cumulative time with ICP above 20 mmHg (pressure-time dose), pressure reactivity index, ICP waveform characteristics (pulse amplitude of ICP, mean ICP wave amplitude), and the compensatory reserve of the brain (reserve-amplitude-pressure), which are useful in predicting patient outcomes and guiding treatment. Further research is required for validation of these parameters compared to simple ICP monitoring.

Keywords: Critical care; Intracranial pressure; Traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiolfi A, Benjamin E, Khor D, Inaba K, Lam L, Demetriades D. Brain trauma foundation guidelines for intracranial pressure monitoring: compliance and effect on outcome. World J Surg. 2017;41:1543–1549. - PubMed
    1. Åkerlund CA, Donnelly J, Zeiler FA, Helbok R, Holst A, Cabeleira M, et al. Impact of duration and magnitude of raised intracranial pressure on outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI high-resolution group study. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0243427. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alali AS, Fowler RA, Mainprize TG, Scales DC, Kiss A, de Mestral C, et al. Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:1737–1746. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anania P, Battaglini D, Pelosi P, Robba C. In: Essentials of evidence-based practice of neuroanesthesia and neurocritical care. Prabhakar H, editor. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2022. Chapter 14. Type of ICP monitor; pp. 193–202.
    1. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care, AANS/CNS. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VII. Intracranial pressure monitoring technology. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S45–S54. - PubMed