Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 3;1(4):e12056.
doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12056. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Clinical validation of the parent-report Toronto Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (TOCS): A pediatric open-source rating scale

Laura J Lambe  1 , Christie L Burton  1 , Evdokia Anagnostou  2   3 , Elizabeth Kelley  4 , Robert Nicolson  5 , Stelios Georgiades  6 , Noam Soreni  6   7 , Russell J Schachar  1   8 , Gregory L Hanna  9 , Paul D Arnold  10   11   12 , Jennifer Crosbie  1   8
Affiliations

Clinical validation of the parent-report Toronto Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (TOCS): A pediatric open-source rating scale

Laura J Lambe et al. JCPP Adv. .

Abstract

Background: There is a need to develop a multipurpose obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) measure that is useful for cross disorder research and as a reliable clinical rating scale. The current study examined the psychometric properties and established clinical cutoffs for the parent-report version of the Toronto Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (TOCS), a 21-item rating scale of obsessive-compulsive traits.

Method: Participants ranged in age from 6 to 21 years old and had a primary diagnosis of OCD (n = 350, 50% female), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 820, 25% female), autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (n = 794, 22% female), or were typically developing controls (n = 391, 51% female). Confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency reliability, and convergent and divergent validity of the TOCS were examined in the OCD group. Using various scoring approaches, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to establish a clinical cut-off by splitting the OCD group into a discovery sample (166 OCD cases, 164 controls) and a validation sample (184 OCD cases, 227 controls). Classification accuracy and TOCS scores were compared across OCD, ADHD, and ASD groups.

Results: The psychometric properties of the TOCS were confirmed. ROC analyses across TOCS scoring approaches in the discovery sample indicated excellent diagnostic discrimination (AUC ≥0.95, sensitivity 77%-92%, specificity 92%-98%). Established cutoffs, when applied in the independent validation sample of OCD cases and controls, showed an overall classification accuracy of 85%-90%. The TOCS total score and symptom count showed good discrimination of OCD from ADHD (AUC ≥0.86) and ASD (AUC ≥0.81). The OCD group scored significantly higher on all TOCS dimensions (except Hoarding) than the ADHD and ASD groups.

Conclusion: The TOCS is a reliable and valid rating scale with strong sensitivity and specificity in discriminating OCD cases from controls, as well as from ASD and ADHD. It is a quantitative OCD measure with important clinical and research applications, with particular relevance for cross disorder phenotyping and population-based studies.

Keywords: ROC analysis; cross‐disorder phenotyping; neurodevelopmental disorders; obsessive–compulsive disorder; obsessive–compulsive traits; scale development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that they have no competing or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Boxplots depicting Toronto Obsessive–Compulsive Scale subscale scores by clinical group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abramowitz, J. S. , Fabricant, L. E. , Taylor, S. , Deacon, B. J. , McKay, D. , & Storch, E. A. (2014). The relevance of analogue studies for understanding obsessions and compulsions. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(3), 206–217. 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berg, C. J. , Rapoport, J. L. , & Flament, M. (1986). The Leyton Obsessional Inventory‐Child Version. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 25(1), 84–91. 10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60602-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burton, C. L. , Crosbie, J. , Dupuis, A. , Mathews, C. A. , Soreni, N. , Schachar, R. , & Arnold, P. D. (2016). Clinical correlates of hoarding with and without comorbid obsessive‐compulsive symptoms in a community pediatric sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(2), 114–121. 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.11.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burton, C. L. , Lemire, M. , Xiao, B. , Corfield, E. C. , Erdman, L. , Bralten, J. , Poelmans, G. , Yu, D. , Shaheen, S.‐M. , Goodale, T. , Sinopoli, V. M. , Soreni, N. , Hanna, G. L. , Fitzgerald, K. D. , Rosenberg, D. , Nestadt, G. , Paterson, A. D. , Strug, L. J. , Schachar, R. J. , … Zai, G. (2021). Genome‐wide association study of pediatric obsessive‐compulsive traits: Shared genetic risk between traits and disorder. Translational Psychiatry, 11(1), 1–10. 10.1038/s41398-020-01121-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burton, C. L. , Park, L. S. , Corfield, E. C. , Forget‐Dubois, N. , Dupuis, A. , Sinopoli, V. M. , Shan, J. , Goodale, T. , Shaheen, S.‐M. , Crosbie, J. , Schachar, R. J. , & Arnold, P. D. (2018). Heritability of obsessive–compulsive trait dimensions in youth from the general population. Translational Psychiatry, 8(1), 1–10. 10.1038/s41398-018-0249-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed