Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Apr 24;15(9):2048.
doi: 10.3390/nu15092048.

Follow-Up of Celiac Disease in Adults: "When, What, Who, and Where"

Affiliations
Review

Follow-Up of Celiac Disease in Adults: "When, What, Who, and Where"

Chris J J Mulder et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

For patients with celiac disease (CeD), a lifelong gluten-free diet is not a voluntary lifestyle choice-it is a necessity. The key end points in clinical follow-up are symptom resolution, the normalization of weight, prevention of overweight, seroconversion, and negation or minimization of increased long-term morbidity. For the latter, a surrogate endpoint is mucosal healing, which means the normalization of histology to Marsh 0-1. Ideally, celiac follow-up care includes a multidisciplinary approach, effective referral processes, improved access that leverages technological advances, and following guidelines with the identification of measurable quality indicators, ideally informed by evidence-based research. Face-to-face CeD care and telemedicine are considered the standards for this process, although published data are insufficient. Guidelines and statements on diagnosis are readily available. However, data are lacking on optimal clinic visit intervals and outcomes and quality indicators such as improvement of symptoms, function and quality of life, survival and disease control, and how to most effectively use healthcare resources. The results of future research should provide the basis for general recommendations for evidence-based standards of quality of care in CeD.

Keywords: celiac centers; celiac disease; digital platform; digitalized dietary assessment; eHealth; follow-up; gluten free diet; nutritional education; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolving approaches to CeD follow-up.

References

    1. Mulder C.J., Wierdsma N.J., Berkenpas M., Jacobs M.A.J.M., Bouma G. Preventing complications in celiac disease: Our experience with managing adult celiac disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2015;29:459–468. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.05.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dubé C., Rostom A., Sy R., Cranney A., Saloojee N., Garritty C., Sampson M., Zhang L., Yazdi F., Mamaladze V., et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in average-risk and at-risk Western European populations: A systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2005;128((4 Suppl. S1)):S57–S67. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Di Sabatino A., Corazza G.R. Coeliac disease. Lancet. 2009;373:1480–1493. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60254-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herman M.L., Rubio-Tapia A., Lahr B.D., Larson J.J., Van Dyke C.T., Murray J.A. Patients with celiac disease are not followed up adequately. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012;10:893–899.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen M.E., Jaffe A., Strauch C.B., Lewis S.K., Lebwohl B., Green P.H.R. Determinants of Follow-up Care for Patients With Celiac Disease. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2018;52:784–788. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000851. - DOI - PubMed