Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 11;13(7):e070944.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070944.

Protocol for scoping review to identify and characterise surgery, obstetric, trauma and anaesthesia care in Ugandan health policy databases

Brian Kasagga  1   2 , Berjo Dongmo Takoutsing  3 , Darius Balumuka  4 , Fortunate Ambangira  5 , Derrick Kasozi  6 , Margaret Amelia Namiiro  7 , John Sekyanzi  8 , Isaac Chebet  8 , Jean Kizito Namatovu  8 , Mercy Namazzi  9 , Yusuf Sadiq  8 , Boniface Mutatina  10 , Ekwaro A Obuku  11   12 , Emmanuel Alex Elobu  13   2
Affiliations

Protocol for scoping review to identify and characterise surgery, obstetric, trauma and anaesthesia care in Ugandan health policy databases

Brian Kasagga et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Diseases addressed by surgical, obstetric, trauma and anaesthesia (SOTA) care are rising globally due to an anticipated rise in the burden of non-communicable diseases and road traffic accidents. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) disproportionately bear the brunt. Evidence-based policies and political commitment are required to reverse this trend. The Lancet Commission of Global Surgery proposed National Surgical and Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plans (NSOAPs) to alleviate the respective SOTA burdens in LMICs. NSOAPs success leverages comprehensive stakeholder engagement and appropriate health policy analyses and recommendations. As Uganda embarks on its NSOAP development, policy prioritisation in Uganda remains unexplored. We, therefore, seek to determine the priority given to SOTA care in Uganda's healthcare policy and systems-relevant documents.

Methods and analysis: We will conduct a scoping review of SOTA health policy and system-relevant documents produced between 2000 and 2022 using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and additional guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's manual. These documents will be sought from the websites of SOTA stakeholders by hand searching. We shall also search from Google Scholar and PubMed using well-defined search strategies. The Knowledge Management Portal for the Ugandan Ministry of Health, which was created to provide evidence-based decision-making data, is the primary source. The rest of the sources will include the following: other repositories like websites of relevant government institutions, international and national non-governmental organisations, professional associations and councils, and religious and medical bureaus. Data retrieved from the eligible policy and decision-making documents will include the year of publication, the global surgery specialty mentioned, the NSOAP surgical system domain, the national priority area involved and funding. The data will be collected in a preformed extraction sheet. Two independent reviewers will screen the collected data, and results will be presented as counts and their respective proportions. The findings will be reported narratively using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews.

Ethics and dissemination: This study will generate evidence-based information on the state of SOTA care in Uganda's health policy, which will inform NSOAP development in this nation. The review's findings will be presented to the Ministry of Health planning task force. The study will also be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication; oral and poster presentations at local, regional, national and international conferences and over social media.

Keywords: ANAESTHETICS; Health policy; OBSTETRICS; SURGERY; Trauma management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. . Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Surgery 2015;158:3–6. 10.1016/j.surg.2015.04.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ologunde R, Maruthappu M, Shanmugarajah K, et al. . Surgical care in low and middle-income countries: burden and barriers. Int J Surg 2014;12:858–63. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marseille E, Morshed S. Essential surgery is cost effective in resource-poor countries. Lancet Glob Health 2014;2:e302–3. 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70236-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L, et al. . Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. In: 386(9993). London, England: Lancet, 2015: 569–624. - PubMed
    1. Price R, Makasa E, Hollands M. World health assembly resolution Wha68.15: "strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anesthesia as a component of universal health Coverage"—Addressing the public health gaps arising from lack of safe, affordable and accessible surgical and anesthetic services. World J Surg 2015;39:2115–25. 10.1007/s00268-015-3153-y - DOI - PubMed