Cost-effectiveness of encorafenib with binimetinib in unresectable or metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma
- PMID: 37433888
- DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01614-6
Cost-effectiveness of encorafenib with binimetinib in unresectable or metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of encorafenib with binimetinib (EncoBini) as compared to other targeted double combination therapies, namely dabrafenib with trametinib (DabraTrame) and vemurafenib with cobimetinib (VemuCobi), for the treatment of BRAF V600-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MM) from the French payer perspective.
Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed considering a lifetime horizon. The model structure simulated the clinical pathway of patients with BRAF V600-mutant MM. Clinical effectiveness and safety inputs were sourced from the COLUMBUS trial, a network meta-analysis and published literature. Costs, resource use, and the quality of life inputs were obtained from the literature and appropriate French sources.
Results: Over a lifetime horizon, EncoBini was associated, on average, with reduced costs and increased quality adjusted life years (QALYs), dominating both targeted double combination therapies. For a willingness-to-pay threshold of €90,000 per QALY, the probability of EncoBini being cost-effective against either comparator remained above 80%. The most influential model parameters were the hazard ratios for the overall survival of EncoBini vs DabraTrame and VemuCobi, the pre- and post-progression utility values, as well as treatment dosages and the relative dose intensity of all interventions.
Conclusion: EncoBini is associated with reduced costs and increased QALYs, dominating other targeted double combination therapies (DabraTrame, VemuCobi) for patients with BRAF V600-mutant MM in France. EncoBini is a highly cost-effective intervention in MM.
Keywords: BRAF; Cost-effectiveness; Economic analysis; Encorafenib; QALY; Unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Overall survival in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma receiving encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1315-1327. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30497-2. Epub 2018 Sep 12. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30219628 Clinical Trial.
-
Encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma (COLUMBUS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):603-615. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30142-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29573941 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibition and targeted treatment in combination as adjuvant treatment of patient with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 18;23(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09058-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 36653848 Free PMC article.
-
Encorafenib in combination with binimetinib for unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF mutations.Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;12(3):259-266. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1570847. Epub 2019 Jan 24. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 30652516 Review.
-
Dabrafenib for Treating Unresectable, Advanced or Metastatic BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Melanoma: An Evidence Review Group Perspective.Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Sep;33(9):893-904. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0276-9. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015. PMID: 25906420 Review.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. 2022.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials