Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;270(11):5372-5379.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11848-2. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

Efficacy of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial

Affiliations

Efficacy of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial

Yuting Shi et al. J Neurol. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most common subtype of SCA without effective treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) in a larger cohort of SCA3 patients.

Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with SCA3 were randomly assigned to the 3 groups: 40 patients in the 1 Hz rTMS, 40 in the iTBS and 40 in the sham group. Patients underwent 10 sessions of rTMS targeting the cerebellum delivering for 5 consecutive days per week for 2 weeks (a total of 1200 pulses per session). Primary outcomes included the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Secondary outcomes included 10-m walking test (10MWT), nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), and PATA Rate Test (PRT). Outcome assessments were performed at baseline and on the last day of rTMS intervention.

Results: This study revealed that active rTMS outperformed sham in reducing the SARA and ICARS scores in SCA3 patients, but with no difference between the 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS protocol. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in SARA and ICARS scores between the mild and moderate to severe groups after the 1 Hz rTMS/iTBS therapy. Additionally, no severe adverse events were recorded in this study.

Conclusions: The study concluded that both 1 Hz rTMS and iTBS interventions targeting the cerebellum are effective to improve the symptoms of ataxia in patients with SCA3.

Keywords: Ataxia; Cerebellum; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; SCA3; iTBS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klockgether T, Mariotti C (2019) Paulson HLJNrDp. Spinocerebellar Ataxia 5:1–21
    1. Chen Z, Wang P, Wang C, Peng Y, Hou X, Zhou X, Li T, Peng H, Qiu R, Xia KJB (2018) Updated frequency analysis of spinocerebellar ataxia in China. Brain 141:e22–e22 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zesiewicz TA, Wilmot G, Kuo SH, Perlman S, Greenstein PE, Ying SH, Ashizawa T, Subramony SH, Schmahmann JD, Figueroa KP, Mizusawa H, Schols L, Shaw JD, Dubinsky RM, Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS, Sullivan KL (2018) Comprehensive systematic review summary: treatment of cerebellar motor dysfunction and ataxia: report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 90:464–471 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Latorre A, Rocchi L, Berardelli A, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC (2019) The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for movement disorders: a critical review. Mov Disord 34:769–782 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farzan F, Wu Y, Manor B, Anastasio EM, Lough M, Novak V, Greenstein PE, Pascual-Leone A (2013) Cerebellar TMS in treatment of a patient with cerebellar ataxia: evidence from clinical, biomechanics and neurophysiological assessments. Cerebellum 12:707–712 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources