Active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research: a Delphi consensus study
- PMID: 37434145
- PMCID: PMC10334649
- DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04973-9
Active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research: a Delphi consensus study
Abstract
Background: The importance and value of involvement of people with lived experience of suicide has been recognized in suicide research and prevention. Nonetheless, clear guidance on research collaboration and co-production is lacking. This study aimed to address this gap by developing a set of guidelines on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide studies., i.e., conducting research with or by people with lived experience, rather than to, about or for them.
Methods: The Delphi method was used to determine statements on best practice for the active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research. Statements were compiled through a systematic search of the scientific and grey literature, and reviewing qualitative data from a recent related study conducted by the authors. Two expert panels: people with lived experience of suicide (n = 44) and suicide researchers (n = 29) rated statements over three rounds of an online survey. Statements endorsed by at least 80% of panellists of each panel were included in the guidelines.
Results: Panellists endorsed 96 out of 126 statements in 17 sections covering the full research cycle from deciding on the research question and securing funding, to conducting research and disseminating and implementing outcomes. Overall, there was a substantial level of agreement between the two panels regarding support from research institutions, collaboration and co-production, communication and shared decision making, conducting research, self-care, acknowledgment, and dissemination and implementation. However, panels also disagreed on specific statements regarding representativeness and diversity, managing expectations, time and budgeting, training, and self-disclosure.
Conclusions: This study identified consensus recommendations on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research, including co-production. Support from research institutions and funders, and training on co-production for researchers and people with lived experience, are needed for successful implementation and uptake of the guidelines.
Keywords: Co-production; Consumers; Delphi study; Guidelines; Lived experience of suicide; Suicide research.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Redevelopment of mental health first aid guidelines for substance use problems: a Delphi study.BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 13;12(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01561-8. BMC Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38351023 Free PMC article.
-
Best practice for integrating digital interventions into clinical care for young people at risk of suicide: a Delphi study.BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 24;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05448-7. BMC Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38267895 Free PMC article.
-
Involving Young People With Lived and Living Experience of Suicide in Suicide Research.Crisis. 2024 Jul;45(4):263-270. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000938. Epub 2024 Feb 14. Crisis. 2024. PMID: 38353004 Free PMC article.
-
Re-development of mental health first aid guidelines for suicidal ideation and behaviour: a Delphi study.BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Sep 13;14:241. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0241-8. BMC Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 25213799 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus recommendations for the assessment and treatment of perinatal obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): A Delphi study.Arch Womens Ment Health. 2023 Jun;26(3):389-399. doi: 10.1007/s00737-023-01315-2. Epub 2023 May 3. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2023. PMID: 37138166 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Towards development of guidelines for harnessing implementation science for suicide prevention: an international Delphi expert consensus study.BMJ Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;3(1):e001206. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001206. eCollection 2025. BMJ Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40297184 Free PMC article.
-
Developing standards for the implementation of stepped care in child and youth mental health service settings: protocol for a multi-method, delphi-based study.BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 26;14(12):e096453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096453. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39725417 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding Suicide Stigma in Fly-In/Fly-Out Workers: A Thematic Analysis of Attitudes Towards Suicide, Help-Seeking and Help-Offering.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 7;22(3):395. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030395. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40238423 Free PMC article.
-
'Wisdom Is Knowledge Plus Experience': Qualitative Study of Lived Experience and Researcher Perspectives on Suicide Research Co-Production.Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e13507. doi: 10.1111/inm.13507. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025. PMID: 39835333 Free PMC article.
-
Codeveloping an Online Resource for People Bereaved by Suicide: Mixed Methods User-Centered Study.JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jan 20;12:e56945. doi: 10.2196/56945. JMIR Ment Health. 2025. PMID: 39832356 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Mental Health Commission . Sit beside me, not above me: supporting safe and effective engagement and participation of people with lived experience. Sydney: NMHC; 2019.
-
- National Health and Medical Research Council and the Consumers Health Forum of Australia . The Statement on Consumer and Community involvement in Health and Medical Research. Canberra: NHMRC; 2016.
-
- Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002;61(2):213–36. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous