Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 26:14:1039839.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1039839. eCollection 2023.

AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies

Affiliations

AI-assisted ethics? considerations of AI simulation for the ethical assessment and design of assistive technologies

Silke Schicktanz et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Current ethical debates on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare treat AI as a product of technology in three ways. First, by assessing risks and potential benefits of currently developed AI-enabled products with ethical checklists; second, by proposing ex ante lists of ethical values seen as relevant for the design and development of assistive technology, and third, by promoting AI technology to use moral reasoning as part of the automation process. The dominance of these three perspectives in the discourse is demonstrated by a brief summary of the literature. Subsequently, we propose a fourth approach to AI, namely, as a methodological tool to assist ethical reflection. We provide a concept of an AI-simulation informed by three separate elements: 1) stochastic human behavior models based on behavioral data for simulating realistic settings, 2) qualitative empirical data on value statements regarding internal policy, and 3) visualization components that aid in understanding the impact of changes in these variables. The potential of this approach is to inform an interdisciplinary field about anticipated ethical challenges or ethical trade-offs in concrete settings and, hence, to spark a re-evaluation of design and implementation plans. This may be particularly useful for applications that deal with extremely complex values and behavior or with limitations on the communication resources of affected persons (e.g., persons with dementia care or for care of persons with cognitive impairment). Simulation does not replace ethical reflection but does allow for detailed, context-sensitive analysis during the design process and prior to implementation. Finally, we discuss the inherently quantitative methods of analysis afforded by stochastic simulations as well as the potential for ethical discussions and how simulations with AI can improve traditional forms of thought experiments and future-oriented technology assessment.

Keywords: conceptual approach; ethical reflection; intelligent assistive technology; person with dementia; simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Concept of an AI-Assisted Simulation includes Ethical Compliance Quantification (ECQ) and two feedback loops (blue and yellow).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Visualization of Trajectories for Simulated Patient Agents with Various Levels of Disorientation Probability (dis_level). Blue = patient state oriented; Red = patient state disoriented.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Value scores computed different value models across 1809 simulation runs (see text for details).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abojabal H., Welsch J., Schickanz S. (under review). Cross-cultural perspectives on intelligent assistive technology in dementia care: Comparing Israeli and German experts’ attitudes - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aliman N., Kester L. J. H. M. (2019). Transformative AI governance and AI-empowered ethical enhancement through preemptive simulations. Delphi 1/2019. 10.21552/DELPHI/2019/1/6 - DOI
    1. Alkadri J., Jutai J. (2016). Cognitive impairment and assistive devices: Outcomes and adverse effects. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng. 3, 2055668316668146. 10.1177/2055668316668146 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amann J., Blasimme A., Vayena E., Frey D., Madai V. I. Precise4Q consortium (2020). Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare. A multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med. Infrom. Decis. Mak. 20 (1), 310. 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson M., Anderson S. L. (2007). Machine ethics. Creating an ethical intelligent agent. Ai Mag. 28 (4), 15–26. 10.1609/aimag.v28i4.2065 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources