Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 26:11:1127885.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1127885. eCollection 2023.

Breastfeeding practices based on the gestational age and weight at birth in the first six months of life in a population-based cohort of infants from North India

Affiliations

Breastfeeding practices based on the gestational age and weight at birth in the first six months of life in a population-based cohort of infants from North India

Sitanshi Sharma et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Short and long term benefits of early Initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in the first six months of life are well established and recommended globally. However, reliable estimates of breastfeeding practices and impact of breastfeeding counselling interventions according to gestational age and weight at birth are not available in low and middle income countries.

Objective: To assess the impact of breastfeeding counselling on EIBF and EBF during the first 6 months of life according to gestational age and weight at birth.

Methods: We analysed the data collected from the Women and Infants Integrated Interventions for Growth Study (WINGS), an individually randomized factorial design trial. Mothers were counselled on EIBF during third trimester of pregnancy. They were supported throughout the first 6 months to continue EBF by early problem identification, frequent home visits and assistance in expressing breastmilk when direct breastfeeding was not possible. Breastfeeding practices were ascertained through 24 h recalls at infant ages 1, 3 and 5 months for both the intervention and control groups by an independent outcome ascertainment team. The World Health Organization (WHO) definitions were used for classification of infant breastfeeding practices. Generalized linear models of the Poisson family with a log-link function were used to estimate the effect of interventions on breastfeeding practices. The relative measures of effect on breastfeeding practices were estimated in term appropriate for gestational age (T-AGA), term small for gestational age (T-SGA), preterm AGA (PT-AGA), preterm SGA (PT-SGA) infants.

Results: Amongst all infants irrespective of gestational age and weight at birth, EIBF was (51.7%) higher amongst the intervention group (IRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.48) compared with the control group. The proportion of exclusively breastfed infants at ages 1 month (IRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28-1.48), 3 months (IRR 2.13, 95% CI 1.30-1.44) and 5 months (IRR 2.78, 95% CI 2.58-3.00) were higher in intervention group than control group. We identified significant interaction (p value for interaction <0.05) between intervention and infant size and gestation at birth on exclusive breastfeeding at 3 and 5 months of age. Subgroup analysis showed that the impact of the intervention was greater on exclusive breastfeeding in PT- SGA infants at 3 months (IRR 3.30, 95% CI 2.20-4.96) and 5 months of age (IRR 5.26, 95% CI 2.98-9.28).

Conclusion: This is one of the first studies wherein impact of breastfeeding counselling interventions in the first 6 months of life was assessed according to infant size and gestation at birth wherein gestational age was reliably estimated. The impact of this intervention was higher in preterm and SGA babies compared to other infants. This finding is important as preterm and SGA infants have a higher burden of mortality and morbidity during early infancy. Intensive breastfeeding counselling to these vulnerable infants is likely to improve overall breastfeeding rates and reduce the adverse outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration: [http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=19339%26EncHid=%26userName=societyforappliedstudies], identifier [#CTRI/2017/06/008908].

Keywords: SGA; birth weight; breastfeeding; exclusive breast feeding (EBF); gestational age (GA); preterm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Breastfeeding practices amongst infants at age 1 month (A) and 5 months (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subgroup analysis for Incidence of Exclusive breastfeeding in infants at 1, 3 and 5 months of age.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet (London, England). (2016) 387(10017):475–90. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chowdhury R, Sinha B, Sankar MJ, Taneja S, Bhandari N, Rollins N, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway: 1992). (2015) 104(467):96–113. 10.1111/apa.13102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collaborators GRF. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990−2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet (London, England). (2020) 396(10258):1223–49. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ICF IIfPSIa. NATIONAL FAMILY HEALTH SURVEY (NFHS-5) Report. I(MARCH 2022) (2022).
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P, et al. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet (London, England). (2014) 384(9938):189–205. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 - DOI - PubMed