Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 10;15(6):e40229.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.40229. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Correlation of Common Carotid Artery Blood Flow Parameters With Transthoracic Echocardiographic Cardiac Output for Assessing Fluid Responsiveness After Passive Leg Raising (PLR) Test in Critically Ill Patients

Rohit Patnaik  1 , Bhuvana Krishna  2 , Sriram Sampath  2
Affiliations

Correlation of Common Carotid Artery Blood Flow Parameters With Transthoracic Echocardiographic Cardiac Output for Assessing Fluid Responsiveness After Passive Leg Raising (PLR) Test in Critically Ill Patients

Rohit Patnaik et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction The passive leg raising (PLR) test is a simple, non-invasive method of knowing fluid responsiveness by acting as an internal-fluid challenge. The PLR test coupled with a non-invasive assessment of stroke volume would be the ideal method to assess fluid responsiveness. This study aimed to determine the correlation between transthoracic echocardiographic cardiac output (TTE-CO) and common carotid artery blood flow (CCABF) parameters in determining fluid responsiveness with the PLR test. Methods We performed a prospective observational study on 40 critically ill patients. Patients were evaluated with a 7-13 MHz linear transducer probe for CCABF parameters calculated using time-averaged mean velocity (TAmean) and with a 1-5 MHz cardiac probe equipped with tissue doppler imaging (TDI) for TTE-CO calculated using left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI) with an apical five-chamber view. Two separate PLR tests (five minutes apart) were done within 48 hours of ICU admission. The first PLR test was to assess the effects on TTE-CO. The second PLR test was performed to assess the effects on CCABF parameters. Patients were designated as fluid responders (FR) if changes in TTE-CO (Δ TTE-CO) ≥ 10 %. Results A positive PLR test was observed in 33% of patients. A strong correlation was present between absolute values of TTE-CO calculated using LVOT VTI and the absolute values of CCABF calculated using TAmean (r=0.60, p<0.05). However, a weak correlation was found between Δ TTE-CO and changes in CCABF (Δ CCABF) during the PLR test (r=0.05, p<0.74). A positive PLR test response could not be detected by Δ CCABF (area under the curve (AUC): 0.59 ± 0.09). Conclusions We found a moderate correlation between TTE-CO and CCABF at baseline. However, Δ TTE-CO had a very poor correlation with Δ CCABF, during the PLR test. Considering this, CCABF parameters may not be recommended as a means to detect fluid responsiveness with PLR tests in critically ill patients.

Keywords: carotid doppler; fluid responsiveness; lvot vti; passive leg raising test; transthoracic echocardiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of patients
Figure 2
Figure 2. Position of the patient during the two PLR maneuvers
PLR, passive leg raising
Figure 3
Figure 3. Probe position for carotid Doppler measurements (anterior view)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Probe position for carotid Doppler measurements (lateral view)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Schematic presentation of Doppler findings of common carotid artery.
PS, peak systolic velocity (white arrow); ED, end-diastolic velocity (yellow arrow); TAmean, time-averaged mean velocity; TAmax, time-averaged peak velocity; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistivity index; HR, heart rate
Figure 6
Figure 6. Probe position for apical five-chamber view (anterior view)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Probe position for apical five-chamber view (lateral view)
Figure 8
Figure 8. Schematic presentation of LVOT VTI measurement in apical five-chamber view (area under yellow tracing)
LVOT VTI, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral
Figure 9
Figure 9. ROC curve for predicting fluid responsiveness with change in CCA blood flow
CCA, common carotid artery; ROC, receiver operating characteristic
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:259–265. - PubMed
    1. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1402–1407. - PubMed
    1. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Applied Physiology in Intensive Care Medicine 2: Physiological Reviews and Editorials. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2012. Passive leg raising; pp. 55–59.
    1. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2642–2647. - PubMed
    1. Intravascular volume monitoring and extravascular lung water in septic patients with pulmonary edema. Boussat S, Jacques T, Levy B, Laurent E, Gache A, Capellier G, Neidhardt A. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:712–718. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources