Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Jul 10;3(7):1189-1199.
doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0401. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Phase Ib/II Study of a Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) plus Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from Phase Ib

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase Ib/II Study of a Liposomal Formulation of Eribulin (E7389-LF) plus Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from Phase Ib

Hanae Ida et al. Cancer Res Commun. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine a recommended dose of liposomal eribulin (E7389-LF) in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors, and to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and biomarker impact of this regimen.

Experimental design: Japanese patients with advanced, nonresectable, or recurrent solid tumors and no existing alternative standard/effective therapy (except nivolumab monotherapy) were assigned to either E7389-LF 1.7 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks, E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks, E7389-LF 1.1 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks, or E7389-LF 1.4 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety/tolerability of each dose cohort and to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary/exploratory objectives, including safety [dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and adverse events (AE)], pharmacokinetics, efficacy [including objective response rate (ORR)], and biomarker results were used in determining the RP2D.

Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled to treatment [E7389-LF 1.7 mg/mg2 every 3 weeks (n = 6), E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (n = 6), E7389-LF 1.1 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (n = 7), E7389-LF 1.4 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (n = 6)]. Twenty-four patients were evaluated for DLTs, of whom 3 had DLTs (1 at E7389-LF 1.7 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, 1 at 1.1 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, and 1 at 1.4 mg/m2 every 2 weeks). All patients had ≥1 treatment-related treatment-emergent AE (TEAE); 68.0% had ≥1 grade 3-4 treatment-related TEAE. Changes in vasculature and IFN-related biomarkers were seen in each cohort. The overall ORR was 16%.

Conclusions: E7389-LF plus nivolumab was tolerable overall; the recommended dose for future study was 2.1 mg/m2 plus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks.

Significance: This phase Ib part of a phase Ib/II study assessed the tolerability and activity of a liposomal formulation of eribulin (E7389-LF) plus nivolumab in 25 patients with advanced solid tumors. The combination was tolerable overall; 4 patients had a partial response. Vasculature and immune-related biomarker levels increased, suggesting vascular remodeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Maximum percentage change from baseline in sums of tumor diameters and best overall response per RECIST v1.1. E7389-LF, eribulin liposomal formulation; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; Q#W, every # weeks; RECIST v1.1, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.1; SD, stable disease.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Percentage changes from baseline in sums of target lesion diameters over time per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Tumor types of patients with at least a 30% reduction at any timepoint are listed. aPlus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks; bplus nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Q#W, every # weeks; RECIST v1.1, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Analyses of changes in key biomarkers from baseline to C1D8 in all dosing cohorts (A) and from C1D1 to C2D1 in the E7389-LF 2.1 mg/m2 every-3-weeks cohort (B). Boxes indicate the median and quartiles, the whiskers represent the largest or smallest values within 1.5 times the interquartile range, and * denotes an unadjusted P value of < 0.05 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test); the diamond shape ◊ denotes outlier. Biomarkers also known as: aTEK; bCXCL10. CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand; C#, cycle; D#, day #; IP10, IFNγ-induced protein 10; Q#W, every # week; TEK, TEK receptor tyrosine kinase; TIE2, tyrosine kinase immunoglobulin and EGF homology domains 2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith JA, Wilson L, Azarenko O, Zhu X, Lewis BM, Littlefield BA, et al. . Eribulin binds at microtubule ends to a single site on tubulin to suppress dynamic instability. Biochemistry 2010;49:1331–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ito K, Hamamichi S, Abe T, Akagi T, Shirota H, Kawano S, et al. . Antitumor effects of eribulin depend on modulation of the tumor microenvironment by vascular remodeling in mouse models. Cancer Sci 2017;108:2273–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Semba T, Tabata K, Ozawa Y, Miyano SW, Matsui J, Funahashi Y. Antitumor activity of eribulin in combination with anti-PD1 antibody in a mouse syngeneic breast cancer model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29–Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79:Abstract nr 4089.
    1. Cortes J, O'Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, Blum JL, Vahdat LT, Petrakova K, et al. . Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet 2011;377:914–23. - PubMed
    1. Schöffski P, Chawla S, Maki RG, Italiano A, Gelderblom H, Choy E, et al. . Eribulin versus dacarbazine in previously treated patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma: a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016;387:1629–37. - PubMed

Publication types