Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
- PMID: 37435781
- PMCID: PMC11590043
- DOI: 10.1002/hon.3202
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Abstract
Large B-cell lymphoma, the prototype of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas, is both the most common lymphoma and accounts for the highest global burden of lymphoma-related deaths. For nearly 4 decades, the goal of treatment has been "cure", first based on CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), and subsequently with rituximab plus CHOP. However, there is significant clinical, pathologic, and biologic heterogeneity, and not all patients are cured. Understanding and incorporating this biologic heterogeneity into treatment decisions unfortunately is not yet standard of care. Despite this gap, we now have significant advances in frontline, relapsed, and refractory settings. The POLARIX trial shows, for the first time, improved progression-free survival in a prospective randomized phase 3 setting. In the relapsed and refractory settings, there are now many approved agents/regimens, and several bispecific antibodies poised to join the arsenal of options. While chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is discussed in detail elsewhere, it has quickly become an excellent option in the second-line setting and beyond. Unfortunately, special populations such as older adults continue to have poor outcomes and be underrepresented in trials, although a new generation of trials aim to address this disparity. This brief review will highlight the key issues and advances that offer improved outcomes to an increasing portion of patients.
Keywords: antibody‐drug conjugates; diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma; older adults; treatment.
© 2023 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Allison Barraclough has received honoraria from Gilead, Janssen, Roche. Eliza Hawkes has research funding paid to her institution from Roche, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Merck KgA, Astra Zeneca; has advisory boards BMS, Astra Zeneca, and advisory fees (paid to institution) from Roche, Gilead, Antengene, Link, Novartis, Beigene and Merck Sharpe & Dohme, speakers fees from Roche, Regeneron, Janssen, AstraZeneca (paid to institution). Sonali M. Smith has consulting fees from Gilead and Ono Pharmaceuticals; institutional research funding from Epizyme, TG Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, FortySeven, Karyopharm, BMS, Acerta, Genentech, Portola, Curis, Celgene.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
