The Role of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Elite Athletes
- PMID: 37436652
- PMCID: PMC10427594
- DOI: 10.1007/s12178-023-09858-8
The Role of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Elite Athletes
Abstract
Purpose of review: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc herniations (CDH) is a promising treatment for professional athletes. In recent years, a number of high-profile athletes have returned to professional play within three months after CDA, raising important questions about the potential of this procedure within this patient group. We provide the first comprehensive review of available literature for the safety and efficacy of CDA in professional contact sport athletes.
Recent findings: CDA provides theoretical biomechanical advantages over anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior foraminotomy (PF), as CDA is the only operation for treatment of CDH that provides neural decompression, stability and height restoration, with preserved range of motion. While the comparative long-term results from each procedure are unknown, CDA has provided encouraging promise in its use in professional contact athletes. We aim to aid ongoing discussions regarding the controversies in spine surgery for professional athletes by providing a scientific review of the available evidence-based literature involving cervical disc arthroplasty in this population. In general, we believe that CDA is a viable alternative to ACDF and PF for the contact professional athlete who requires full neck range of motion and desires an expedited return to play. For collision athletes, the short- and long-term safety and efficacy profile of this procedure is promising but still unclear.
Keywords: Cervical disc arthroplasty; Cervical disc replacement; Major League Baseball; National Football League; Professional athletes; Spine surgery.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Hogan Brecount – No conflicts; Alyssa Goodwin – No conflicts; Dr. David Hiltzik – No conflicts; Dr. Wellington Hsu – Advisory board member of Stryker, Medtronic, Asahi, Bioventus.
Similar articles
-
The Difference in Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Fusion, Disk Replacement, and Foraminotomy in Professional Athletes.Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Feb;31(1):E80-E84. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000570. Clin Spine Surg. 2018. PMID: 28719454
-
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28291414
-
Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty-Long-Term Evidence Update.Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S36-S40. doi: 10.14444/7089. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32994304 Free PMC article.
-
Return-to-Play Outcomes in Elite Athletes After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.Sports Health. 2021 Sep-Oct;13(5):437-445. doi: 10.1177/19417381211007813. Epub 2021 Apr 15. Sports Health. 2021. PMID: 33858287 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/os.12585. Epub 2019 Dec 21. Orthop Surg. 2020. PMID: 31863642 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Eubanks JD. Cervical radiculopathy: nonoperative management of neck pain and radicular symptoms. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(1):33–40. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials