The effect of percentage of ideal body weight on outcomes in ileo-anal pull through for ulcerative colitis
- PMID: 37436666
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04484-9
The effect of percentage of ideal body weight on outcomes in ileo-anal pull through for ulcerative colitis
Abstract
Purpose: Ileo-anal pull through (IAPT) is a commonly performed operation for the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. The effect of body weight on outcomes for patients undergoing this operation has not been extensively studied.
Methods: This was a prospective cohort study at a single tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. A total of 457 patients who were operated on at the Mount Sinai Medical Center between 1983 and 2015 were included. Demographic characteristics, the patients' body weight at the time of IAPT, and postoperative outcome data were collected.
Results: For each patient, body weight was calculated as a percentage of the ideal body weight (IBW) for that patient's height. The mean percentage of ideal body weight was 93.9% with a standard deviation of 20%. The range for the population was 53.1 to 175%. Four hundred forty (96%) of the patients had a weight within two standard deviations of the mean, indicating a normal distribution. Seventy-nine patients developed a Clavien-Dindo class III complication necessitating a procedural treatment. The most common of these was a stricture at the anastomotic site (n = 54). Our study identified an association between a percentage of ideal body weight in the lowest quartile of our population and development of an anastomotic stricture. This association was statistically significant on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: Low body weight at the time of ileo-anal pull through for treatment of UC may be a risk factor for development of anastomotic stricture requiring dilation.
Keywords: BMI; Body weight; Ileo-anal pull through; Obesity; Surgery; Ulcerative colitis.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Slow and Steady Wins the Race: A Solid Case for a 3-Stage Approach in Ulcerative Colitis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Dec 1;64(12):1511-1520. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002113. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021. PMID: 34561342
-
Proctocolectomy and J-pouch ileo-anal anastomosis in children.J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Jan;37(1):66-70. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2002.29429. J Pediatr Surg. 2002. PMID: 11781989
-
Risk factors and outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Retrospective study of 75 single center cases.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Mar;27(5):1945-1953. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202303_31559. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36930489
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with obesity.Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1629-1636. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jul 2. Surgery. 2021. PMID: 34226045
-
Outcome of Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis in Patients With Indeterminate Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Crohns Colitis. 2020 Jul 30;14(7):1010-1020. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa002. J Crohns Colitis. 2020. PMID: 31912129
References
-
- Lask A, Biebl M, Dittrich L et al (2021) Safety of transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a retrospective observational cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 15(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-021-00306-5 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Peyrin-Biroulet L, Germain A, Patel AS, Lindsay JO (2016) Systematic review: outcomes and post-operative complications following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 44(8):807–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13763 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Müller MJ (2016) Ideal body weight or BMI: so, what’s it to be? Am J Clin Nutr 103(5):1193–1194. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.134221 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pai M, Paloucek F (2000) The origin of the “ideal” body weight equations. Ann Pharmacother 34(9):1066–1069. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.19381 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nuttall FQ (2015) Body mass index: obesity, BMI, and health: a critical review. Nutrition today (Annapolis) 50(3):117–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/NT.0000000000000092 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical