Cytomegalovirus Immune reconstitution in cord blood transplant recipients on letermovir prophylaxis
- PMID: 37436771
- PMCID: PMC10592381
- DOI: 10.1111/tid.14104
Cytomegalovirus Immune reconstitution in cord blood transplant recipients on letermovir prophylaxis
Abstract
Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause significant morbidity and mortality in cord blood transplant (CBT) recipients. Development of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) has been associated with protection against CMV clinically significant reactivation (CsCMV). In this study, we evaluated CMV-CMI reconstitution during letermovir prophylactic therapy, which prevents CsCMV without complete suppression of CMV reactivation.
Methods: We measured CMV-CMI in CMV-seropositive CBT recipients pre-transplant after Day+90 of letermovir prophylaxis and at Days +180, and +360- post-transplant using a dual color CMV-specific IFNγ/IL2 FLUOROSpot. CsCMV and nonCsCMV reactivations were abstracted from medical records. CsCMV was defined as CMV viral load ≥5,000 IU/ml using a whole blood assay.
Results: Among 70 CBT recipients, 31 developed CMV-CMI by Day+90 and an additional eight and five participants by Days +180 and +360, respectively. Thirty-eight participants developed CMV reactivation, including nine with CsCMV. Most reactivations (33 of 38) occurred before Day+180. Early CMV-CMI was present in six out of nine participants with CsCMV, indicating a lack of protection against CsCMV. Moreover, the magnitude of CMV-CMI at Day+90 did not differ between participants with CsCMV and nonCsCMV.
Conclusion: Approximately 50% of CBT recipients reconstituted CMV-CMI during letermovir prophylactic therapy. However, CMV-CMI did not reach levels protective against CsCMV. Extension of CMV prophylaxis beyond Day+90 may be considered in CMV-seropositive CBT recipients.
Keywords: cytomegalovirus; immune reconstitution; letermovir.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest/ Disclosures
This study was supported by an investigator-initiated research grant from Merck & Co, Inc. AW receives research grants from GSK and honoraria from GSK and Seqirus.
Figures
Similar articles
-
ELISPOT as a predictor of clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection after hematopoietic cell transplantation in letermovir recipients.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025 Aug;60(8):1137-1145. doi: 10.1038/s41409-025-02611-4. Epub 2025 May 6. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025. PMID: 40328898
-
Extended duration letermovir in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.Transpl Immunol. 2023 Dec;81:101936. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101936. Epub 2023 Sep 26. Transpl Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37770000
-
Risk factors for late cytomegalovirus infection after completing letermovir prophylaxis.Int J Hematol. 2022 Aug;116(2):258-265. doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03348-2. Epub 2022 May 6. Int J Hematol. 2022. PMID: 35524024
-
A new direction for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis among transplant recipients: Benefits and nonviral outcomes of letermovir use as primary CMV prophylaxis.Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023 Dec 1;36(6):514-521. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000983. Epub 2023 Sep 29. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37773928 Review.
-
CMV prevention strategies in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; the role of prophylaxis and pre-emptive monitoring in the era of letermovir.Transpl Infect Dis. 2023 Nov;25 Suppl 1:e14171. doi: 10.1111/tid.14171. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Transpl Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37864299 Review.
References
-
- Ariza-Heredia EJ, Nesher L, Chemaly RF. Cytomegalovirus diseases after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a mini-review. Cancer Lett 2014;342(1):1–8. - PubMed
-
- Marty FM, Ljungman P, Chemaly RF, Maertens J, Dadwal SS, Duarte RF, et al. Letermovir Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus in Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation. N Engl J Med 2017;377(25):2433–44. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical