An international survey of SEEG cortical stimulation practices
- PMID: 37437189
- PMCID: PMC10472359
- DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12790
An international survey of SEEG cortical stimulation practices
Abstract
Objective: Cortical stimulation is an important component of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Despite this, there is currently no standardized approach and significant heterogeneity in the literature regarding cortical stimulation practices. Via an international survey of SEEG clinicians, we sought to examine the spectrum of cortical stimulation practices to reveal areas of consensus and variability.
Methods: A 68-item questionnaire was developed to understand cortical stimulation practices including neurostimulation parameters, interpretation of epileptogenicity, functional and cognitive assessment and subsequent surgical decisions. Multiple recruitment pathways were pursued, with the questionnaire distributed directly to 183 clinicians.
Results: Responses were received from 56 clinicians across 17 countries with experience ranging from 2 to 60 years (M = 10.73, SD = 9.44). Neurostimulation parameters varied considerably, with maximum current ranging from 3 to 10 mA (M = 5.33, SD = 2.29) for 1 Hz and from 2 to 15 mA (M = 6.54, SD = 3.68) for 50 Hz stimulation. Charge density ranged from 8 to 200 μC/cm2 , with up to 43% of responders utilizing charge densities higher than recommended upper safety limits, i.e. 55 μC/cm2 . North American responders reported statistically significant higher maximum current (P < 0.001) for 1 Hz stimulation and lower pulse width for 1 and 50 Hz stimulation (P = 0.008, P < 0.001, respectively) compared to European responders. All clinicians evaluated language, speech, and motor function during cortical stimulation; in contrast, 42% assessed visuospatial or visual function, 29% memory, and 13% executive function. Striking differences were reported in approaches to assessment, classification of positive sites, and surgical decisions guided by cortical stimulation. Patterns of consistency were observed for interpretation of the localizing capacity of stimulated electroclinical seizures and auras, with habitual electroclinical seizures induced by 1 Hz stimulation considered the most localizing.
Significance: SEEG cortical stimulation practices differed vastly across clinicians internationally, highlighting the need for consensus-based clinical guidelines. In particular, an internationally standardized approach to assessment, classification, and functional prognostication will provide a common clinical and research framework for optimizing outcomes for people with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Keywords: direct cortical stimulation; epilepsy; mapping; stereo-EEG.
© 2023 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparing electrical stimulation functional mapping with subdural electrodes and stereoelectroencephalography.Epilepsia. 2023 Jun;64(6):1527-1540. doi: 10.1111/epi.17575. Epub 2023 Mar 17. Epilepsia. 2023. PMID: 36872854 Free PMC article.
-
The stereotactic approach for mapping epileptic networks: a prospective study of 200 patients.J Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;121(5):1239-46. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132306. Epub 2014 Aug 22. J Neurosurg. 2014. PMID: 25148007
-
Early onset motor semiology in seizures triggered by cortical stimulation during SEEG.Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Nov;88:262-267. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Epilepsy Behav. 2018. PMID: 30317060
-
Stereoelectroencephalography in children: a review.Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Sep;45(3):E7. doi: 10.3171/2018.6.FOCUS18226. Neurosurg Focus. 2018. PMID: 30173607 Review.
-
The changing landscape of electrical stimulation language mapping with subdural electrodes and stereoelectroencephalography for pediatric epilepsy: A literature review and commentary.Epilepsia. 2024 Jul;65(7):1879-1898. doi: 10.1111/epi.18009. Epub 2024 May 24. Epilepsia. 2024. PMID: 38787551 Review.
Cited by
-
Electrical Stimulation for the Induction of Seizures is Safe, Well-tolerated and High-Yield in Children with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jun 26:2025.06.17.25329709. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.17.25329709. medRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40666350 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
"Worldwide Heterogeneity in Stereo-EEG Theory and Practice: Do all Roads Lead to Rome?".Epilepsy Curr. 2025 Mar 2;25(3):161-163. doi: 10.1177/15357597251318541. eCollection 2025 May-Jun. Epilepsy Curr. 2025. PMID: 40040856 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Physiological and pathological neuronal connectivity in the living human brain based on intracranial EEG signals: the current state of research.Front Netw Physiol. 2023 Nov 30;3:1297345. doi: 10.3389/fnetp.2023.1297345. eCollection 2023. Front Netw Physiol. 2023. PMID: 38107334 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stereoelectroencephalography for Epilepsy Presurgical Assessment: A Nationwide Survey of Evolution of Practice in Australia.Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;15(4):e200512. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200512. Epub 2025 Jul 7. Neurol Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 40641571 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Britton JW. Electrical stimulation mapping with stereo‐EEG electrodes. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;35(2):110–114. - PubMed
-
- Abdallah C, Brissart H, Colnat‐Coulbois S, Pierson L, Aron O, Forthoffer N, et al. Stereoelectroencephalographic language mapping of the basal temporal cortex predicts postoperative naming outcome. J Neurosurg. 2021;1:1–11. - PubMed
-
- Isnard J, Taussig D, Bartolomei F, Bourdillon P, Catenoix H, Chassoux F, et al. French guidelines on stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Neurophysiol Clin. 2018;48(1):5–13. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources