Device Effectiveness for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Treatment: An Analysis of K-VIS ELLA Registry
- PMID: 37438031
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.002
Device Effectiveness for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Treatment: An Analysis of K-VIS ELLA Registry
Abstract
Background: Although drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DES) are frequently used for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease, their mid- or long-term clinical efficacy in real-world practice is still limited.
Objectives: From the K-VIS ELLA (Korean Vascular Intervention Society Endovascular Therapy in Lower Limb Artery Diseases) multicenter registry cohort, clinical outcomes of drug-eluting devices for FPA lesions in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS) were evaluated.
Methods: Limbs that underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for FPA lesions with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA, n = 826), BMS (n = 943), DCBs (n = 778), or DES (n = 227) between 2012 and 2020 were included. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for confounding.
Results: After inverse probability of treatment weighting, baseline characteristics were well-balanced among groups. Compared with the 2-year cumulative incidence of TLR with BMS (26.5%), the incidence of TLR was significantly lower in limbs treated with DCBs (15.9%; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.30-0.64; P < 0.001) or DES (15.9%; HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.87; P = 0.014). No significant differences were observed in the risk of TLR between DCBs vs DES (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.51-1.49; P = 0.613) and POBA vs BMS (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.73-1.21; P = 0.626). All-cause mortality was comparable in the 4 groups. Treatment with DCBs showed a more pronounced favorable outcome in limbs with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II type C/D lesions or long lesions (≥150 mm) compared with POBA, BMS, or DES (Pinteraction< 0.05).
Conclusions: In real-world practice, DCBs and DES demonstrated comparably superior midterm outcomes over POBA or BMS in the treatment of FPA lesions.
Keywords: drug-coated balloon; drug-eluting stent(s); endovascular; femoropopliteal artery disease; peripheral artery disease.
Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by grants from the Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant HC20C0081); the Korea Medical Device Development Fund funded by the Korean government (grants 202011B29-03 and 202011D12-02); the Korea Health Technology R and D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (grant HI20C1566) and Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation and MSIT (grant 2020M3A9I4038455); and the Cardiovascular Research Center. Dr Ko has received research grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Samjin Pharm, Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and Dong-A ST. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
Is Drug-Coated Balloon the Real Winner for Femoropopliteal Artery Intervention?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul 10;16(13):1651-1653. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.048. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023. PMID: 37438032 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources