Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Jul 10;16(13):1640-1650.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.05.002.

Device Effectiveness for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Treatment: An Analysis of K-VIS ELLA Registry

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Device Effectiveness for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Treatment: An Analysis of K-VIS ELLA Registry

Seung-Jun Lee et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. .

Abstract

Background: Although drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DES) are frequently used for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease, their mid- or long-term clinical efficacy in real-world practice is still limited.

Objectives: From the K-VIS ELLA (Korean Vascular Intervention Society Endovascular Therapy in Lower Limb Artery Diseases) multicenter registry cohort, clinical outcomes of drug-eluting devices for FPA lesions in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS) were evaluated.

Methods: Limbs that underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for FPA lesions with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA, n = 826), BMS (n = 943), DCBs (n = 778), or DES (n = 227) between 2012 and 2020 were included. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 2 years. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for confounding.

Results: After inverse probability of treatment weighting, baseline characteristics were well-balanced among groups. Compared with the 2-year cumulative incidence of TLR with BMS (26.5%), the incidence of TLR was significantly lower in limbs treated with DCBs (15.9%; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.30-0.64; P < 0.001) or DES (15.9%; HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.87; P = 0.014). No significant differences were observed in the risk of TLR between DCBs vs DES (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.51-1.49; P = 0.613) and POBA vs BMS (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.73-1.21; P = 0.626). All-cause mortality was comparable in the 4 groups. Treatment with DCBs showed a more pronounced favorable outcome in limbs with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II type C/D lesions or long lesions (≥150 mm) compared with POBA, BMS, or DES (Pinteraction< 0.05).

Conclusions: In real-world practice, DCBs and DES demonstrated comparably superior midterm outcomes over POBA or BMS in the treatment of FPA lesions.

Keywords: drug-coated balloon; drug-eluting stent(s); endovascular; femoropopliteal artery disease; peripheral artery disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by grants from the Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant HC20C0081); the Korea Medical Device Development Fund funded by the Korean government (grants 202011B29-03 and 202011D12-02); the Korea Health Technology R and D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (grant HI20C1566) and Bio and Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation and MSIT (grant 2020M3A9I4038455); and the Cardiovascular Research Center. Dr Ko has received research grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Cook Medical, Samjin Pharm, Korea Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and Dong-A ST. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources