Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 28;69(1):50-60.
doi: 10.4187/respcare.10881.

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated With Re-Intubation Secondary to Respiratory Failure in Patients With COVID-19 ARDS

Affiliations

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated With Re-Intubation Secondary to Respiratory Failure in Patients With COVID-19 ARDS

Ramez M Halaseh et al. Respir Care. .

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 is associated with variable symptoms and clinical sequelae. Studies have examined the clinical course of these patients, finding a prolonged need for invasive ventilation and variable re-intubation rates. However, no research has investigated factors and outcomes related to re-intubation secondary to respiratory failure among patients with COVID-19 with ARDS.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study on subjects intubated for ARDS secondary to COVID-19. The primary outcome was re-intubation status; secondary outcomes were hospital and ICU stay and mortality. Data were analyzed using between-group comparisons using chi-square testing for categorical information and Student t test for quantitative data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors related to re-intubation and mortality as dependent variables.

Results: One hundred and fourteen subjects were included, of which 32% required re-intubation. No between-group differences were detected for most demographic variables or comorbidities. No differences were detected in COVID-19 treatments, noninvasive respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support, or duration of ventilation. Midazolam (odds ratio [OR] 5.55 [95% CI 1.83-16.80], P = .002), fentanyl (OR 3.64 [95% CI 1.26-10.52], P = .02), and APACHE II scores (OR 1.08 [95% CI 1.030-1.147], P = .005) were independently associated with re-intubation (area under the curve = 0.81). Re-intubated subjects had extended hospital (36.7 ± 22.7 d vs 26.1 ± 12.1 d, P = .01) and ICU (29.6 ± 22.4 d vs 15.8 ± 10.4 d, P < .001) stays. More subjects died who failed extubation (49% vs 3%, P < .001). Age (OR 1.07 [95% CI 1.02-1.23], P = .005), male sex (OR 4.9 [95% CI 1.08-22.35], P = .041), positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) (OR 5.43 [95% CI 1.58-18.62], P = .007), and re-intubation (OR 12.75 [95% CI 2.80-57.10], P < .001) were independently associated with death (area under the curve = 0.93).

Conclusions: Midazolam, fentanyl, and higher APACHE II scores were independently associated with re-intubation secondary to respiratory failure in subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS. Furthermore, age, male sex, positive CAM-ICU, and re-intubation were independently associated with mortality. Re-intubation also correlated with prolonged hospital and ICU stay.

Keywords: ARDS; COVID-19; analgesic; delirium; extubation failure; mechanical ventilation; mortality; re-intubation; respiratory failure; sedation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Receiver operating characteristic curves of the entire model, midazolam, fentanyl, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score obtained when predicting re-intubation. Area under the curve for the entire model was 0.807. Area under the curve was 0.685 for midazolam, 0.680 for fentanyl use, and 0.704 for APACHE II score. APACHE II = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Receiver operating characteristic curves of the entire model, subject age, male sex, re-intubation within 7 d, and positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) score obtained when predicting mortality. Area under the curve for the entire model was 0.933. Area under the curve was 0.686 for subject age, 0.684 for male sex, 0.811 for re-intubation within 7 d, and 0.651 for positive CAM-ICU score. CAM-ICU = Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72, 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020;323(13):1239–1242. - PubMed
    1. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. . the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5,700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA 2020;323(20):2052–2059. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, Rajagopalan H, O'Donnell L, Chernyak Y, et al. . Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5,279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2020;369:m1966. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, et al. . Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395(10239):1763–1770. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luo M, Cao S, Wei L, Zhao X, Gao F, Li S, et al. . Intubation, mortality, and risk factors in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a pilot study. J Clin Anesth 2020;67:110039. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources