Medication abortion via digital health in the United States: a systematic scoping review
- PMID: 37438435
- PMCID: PMC10338479
- DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00871-2
Medication abortion via digital health in the United States: a systematic scoping review
Abstract
Digital health, including telemedicine, has increased access to abortion care. The convenience, flexibility of appointment times, and ensured privacy to abortion users may make abortion services via telemedicine preferable. This scoping review systematically mapped studies conducted on abortion services via telemedicine, including their effectiveness and acceptability for abortion users and providers. All published papers included abortion services via telemedicine in the United States were considered. Articles were searched in PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases in September 2022. The findings were synthesized narratively, and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to report this study. Out of 757 retrieved articles, 33 articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2011 and 2022, with 24 published in the last 3 years. The study found that telemedicine increased access to abortion care in the United States, especially for people in remote areas or those worried about stigma from in-person visits. The effectiveness of abortion services via telemedicine was comparable to in-clinic visits, with 6% or fewer abortions requiring surgical intervention. Both care providers and abortion seekers expressed positive perceptions of telemedicine-based abortion services. However, abortion users reported mixed emotions, with some preferring in-person visits. The most common reasons for choosing telemedicine included the distance to the abortion clinic, convenience, privacy, cost, flexibility of appointment times, and state laws imposing waiting periods or restrictive policies. Telemedicine offered a preferable option for abortion seekers and providers. The feasibility of accessing abortion services via telemedicine in low-resource settings needs further investigation.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Federal, state, and institutional barriers to the expansion of medication and telemedicine abortion services in Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic.Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 27. Contraception. 2021. PMID: 33930382 Free PMC article.
-
The difficult process of autonomous choice: using I-poems to understand experiences of abortion-seekers in The Netherlands.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2215963. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2215963. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023. PMID: 37378954 Free PMC article.
-
Access to and sustainability of abortion services: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence-new clinical guidelines for England.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Nov 1;26(6):886-903. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa026. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32712660
-
Telemedicine in Pediatrics: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021 Feb 24;4(1):e22696. doi: 10.2196/22696. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021. PMID: 33556030 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Behavioral Innovations to Access Abortion Post-Dobbs: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Reddit's r/abortion Community in 2022.Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251351192. doi: 10.1177/00469580251351192. Epub 2025 Jun 27. Inquiry. 2025. PMID: 40577373 Free PMC article.
-
Telehealth enables safe medication abortion in shifting health and legal contexts.Nat Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):946-947. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02876-0. Nat Med. 2024. PMID: 38491153 No abstract available.
-
Transforming women's health, empowerment, and gender equality with digital health: evidence-based policy and practice.Lancet Digit Health. 2025 Jun;7(6):100858. doi: 10.1016/j.landig.2025.01.014. Epub 2025 May 13. Lancet Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40368744 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sexual and reproductive health and rights and bodily autonomy in a digital world.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(4):2269003. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2269003. Epub 2023 Nov 6. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023. PMID: 37930349 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. What is Digital Health? (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2020).
-
- World Health Organization. Telemedicine: Opportunities and Developments in Member States: Report on the Second Global Survey on eHealth 2009 Vol. 2 (World Health Organization, 2010).
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources