Influence of season and conditions of surrogate sows on efficiency of somatic cell cloning production
- PMID: 37438878
- DOI: 10.1111/rda.14429
Influence of season and conditions of surrogate sows on efficiency of somatic cell cloning production
Abstract
This study was focused on the effects of ovary acquisition season, embryo transfer season, and conditions of surrogate sows on cloning efficiency, with the objective of improving the production of cloned pigs. The statistical analysis documented that cloning efficiency was highest when ovary extraction and embryo transfer occurred in the spring, and lowest when such operations occurred in the autumn. This was evidenced by the higher number of recovered oocytes (3.2 ± 0.47 vs. 2.5 ± 0.51), rate of mature oocytes (57.4 ± 0.07% vs. 48.9 ± 0.06%), rate of developed cloned blastocysts (35.7 ± 0.12% vs. 34.4 ± 0.07%), pregnancy rate of surrogate sows (73.5% vs. 33.3%), delivery rate (67.6% vs. 16.7%), litter size (6.9 ± 2.3 vs. 2.3 ± 2.5), and the number of alive newborns (5.7 ± 2.2 vs. 1.3 ± 1.2). Cloning efficiency was little affected by the ovulatory status of the surrogate sow prior to embryo transfer. The length of pregnancy, the parity, and the length of labor of the surrogate sow significantly affected the efficiency of generating pigs cloned from somatic cells. Specifically, when length of pregnancy ranged from 111 to 117 days, surrogate sows with shorter gestation period had larger litter size (8.9 ± 2.8) and a higher number of stillbirths per litter (2.1 ± 2.0). Moreover, statistical analysis indicated that selecting sows with 2-4 parities as surrogates led to increased litter size (7.7 ± 3.0) and the number of alive newborns (6.4 ± 3.1). In comparison with naturally breeding sows, the surrogate sows spent more time giving birth and suffered higher rates of stillbirth. The data obtained in this study provide valuable insights for improving the production efficiency of somatic cell cloned pigs.
Keywords: nuclear transfer; pig; season; surrogate sows.
© 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Dominguez, J. C., Pena, F. J., Anel, L., & Carbajo, M. (1996). Swine summer infertility syndrome in north West Spain. The Veterinary Record, 139(4), 93-94. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.139.4.93
-
- Hagan, J. K., & Etim, N. N. (2019). The effects of breed, season and parity on the reproductive performance of pigs reared under hot and humid environments. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51(2), 411-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1705-5
-
- Hazeleger, W., & Kemp, B. (2001). Recent developments in pig embryo transfer. Theriogenology, 56(8), 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-691x(01)00633-1
-
- Huang, Y., Ouyang, H., Yu, H., Lai, L., Pang, D., & Li, Z. (2013). Efficiency of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer - a retrospective study of factors related to embryo recipient and embryos transferred. Biology Open, 2(11), 1223-1228. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20135983
-
- Ishii, A., Vinuela, F., Murayama, Y., Yuki, I., Nien, Y. L., Yeh, D. T., & Vinters, H. V. (2006). Swine model of carotid artery atherosclerosis: Experimental induction by surgical partial ligation and dietary hypercholesterolemia. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 27(9), 1893-1899.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical