Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 2;228(9):1253-1262.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad262.

Superior Boosting of Neutralizing Titers Against Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variants by Heterologous SCB-2019 Vaccine vs a Homologous Booster in CoronaVac-Primed Adults

Camilo C Roa Jr  1 , Mari Rose A de Los Reyes  2 , Eric Plennevaux  3 , Igor Smolenov  4 , Branda Hu  4 , Faith Gao  4 , Hannalyn Ilagan  4 , Donna Ambrosino  5 , George Siber  6 , Ralf Clemens  7
Affiliations

Superior Boosting of Neutralizing Titers Against Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variants by Heterologous SCB-2019 Vaccine vs a Homologous Booster in CoronaVac-Primed Adults

Camilo C Roa Jr et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: We compared homologous and heterologous boosting in adults in the Philippines primed with 2 or 3 doses of CoronaVac, with recombinant protein vaccine, SCB-2019.

Methods: CoronaVac-immunized adults (18-72 years) received a homologous or heterologous full or half dose SCB-2019 booster. We assessed all neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses against prototype SARS-CoV-2 after 15 days and NAb against SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants in subsets (30‒50 per arm). Participants recorded adverse events.

Results: In 2-dose CoronaVac-primed adults prototype NAb geometric mean titers (GMT) were 203 IU/mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 182-227) and 939 IU/mL (95% CI, 841-1049) after CoronaVac and SCB-2019 boosters; the GMT ratio (4.63; 95% CI, 3.95-5.41) met predefined noninferiority and post-hoc superiority criteria. After 3-dose CoronaVac-priming prototype NAb GMTs were 279 IU/mL (95% CI, 240-325), 1044 IU/mL (95% CI, 898-1213), and 668 IU/mL (95% CI, 520-829) following CoronaVac, full and half-dose SCB-2019 boosters, respectively. NAb GMT ratios against Delta and Omicron comparing SCB-2019 with CoronaVac were all greater than 2. Mild to moderate reactogenicity was evenly balanced between groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Full or half dose SCB-2019 boosters were well tolerated with superior immunogenicity than homologous CoronaVac, particularly against newly emerged variants. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT05188677.

Keywords: COVID-19; CoronaVac; Delta; Omicron; SCB-2019; booster; immunogenicity; reactogenicity; recombinant protein; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Disposition of participants in safety set and per protocol immunogenicity sets in stages 1 and 2 of the study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Immune responses in the 2 stages as geometric mean neutralizing titers (IU/mL) with 95% CI against prototype SARS-CoV-2 on day 1, before the indicated booster vaccinations, and day 15 in both stages. Numbers above columns show GMT values. GMT ratios (95% CI) by ANCOVA between SCB-2019 and CoronaVac groups are shown above; GMFR are shown below. Titers are expressed in IU/mL using the World Health Organization standard 21/234. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GMFR, geometric mean fold rise; GMT, geometric mean titer; IU, international unit.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
GMT (1/dilution) of neutralizing antibodies against prototype, Delta, and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants in subsets of stage 2 including fourth-dose CoronaVac (n = 50), full-dose (n = 49), and half-dose (n = 50) SCB-2019 study groups, with GMFR (95% CI) between days 1 and 15 indicated. For Omicron BF.7, BQ1.1.1, and XBB.1.5 subsets were 30 for fourth-dose CoronaVac (n = 30), full-dose SCB-2019 (n = 29), and half-dose SCB-2019 (n = 30), with GMFR (95% CI) between days 1 and 15 indicated below. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GMFR, geometric mean fold rise; GMT, geometric mean titer.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Proportions of the 2 study groups with solicited local reactions and systemic adverse events (AEs) by highest severity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Callaway E. Are COVID surges becoming more predictable? New Omicron variants offer a hint. Nature 2022; 605:204–6. - PubMed
    1. Candido KL, Eich CR, de Fariña LO, et al. . Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 variants: a brief review and practical implications. Braz J Microbiol 2022; 53:1133–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murano K, Guo Y, Siomi H. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants threatens to decrease the efficacy of neutralizing antibodies and vaccines. Biochem Soc Trans 2021; 49:2879–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noor R, Shareen S, Billah M. COVID-19 vaccines: their effectiveness against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its emerging variants. Bull Natl Res Cent 2022; 46:96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addo IY, Dadzie FA, Okeke SR, Boadi C, Boadu EF. Duration of immunity following full vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review. Arch Pub Health 2022; 80:200. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

Associated data