Prognostic factors for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with non-DIPG grade 4 gliomas: a contemporary pooled institutional experience
- PMID: 37440097
- PMCID: PMC11938388
- DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04386-4
Prognostic factors for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with non-DIPG grade 4 gliomas: a contemporary pooled institutional experience
Abstract
Purpose: WHO grade 4 gliomas are rare in the pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. We evaluated prognostic factors and outcomes in the pediatric versus AYA population.
Methods: This retrospective pooled study included patients less than 30 years old (yo) with grade 4 gliomas treated with modern surgery and radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were characterized using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.
Results: Ninety-seven patients met criteria with median age 23.9 yo at diagnosis. Seventy-seven patients were ≥ 15 yo (79%) and 20 patients were < 15 yo (21%). Most had biopsy-proven glioblastoma (91%); the remainder had H3 K27M-altered diffuse midline glioma (DMG; 9%). All patients received surgery and radiotherapy. Median PFS and OS were 20.9 months and 79.4 months, respectively. Gross total resection (GTR) was associated with better PFS in multivariate analysis [HR 2.00 (1.01-3.62), p = 0.023]. Age ≥ 15 yo was associated with improved OS [HR 0.36 (0.16-0.81), p = 0.014] while female gender [HR 2.12 (1.08-4.16), p = 0.03] and DMG histology [HR 2.79 (1.11-7.02), p = 0.029] were associated with worse OS. Only 7% of patients experienced grade 2 toxicity. 62% of patients experienced tumor progression (28% local, 34% distant). Analysis of salvage treatment found that second surgery and systemic therapy significantly improved survival.
Conclusion: Age is a significant prognostic factor in WHO grade 4 glioma, which may reflect age-related molecular alterations in the tumor. DMG was associated with worse OS than glioblastoma. Reoperation and systemic therapy significantly increased survival after disease progression. Prospective studies in this population are warranted.
Keywords: Adolescent; Diffuse midline glioma; Glioblastoma; High grade glioma; Pediatric; Young adult.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None
Figures



Similar articles
-
High-grade gliomas in children and adolescents: is there a role for reoperation?J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020 Dec 11;27(2):160-169. doi: 10.3171/2020.7.PEDS20389. Print 2021 Feb 1. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 33307529
-
Outcomes of multidisciplinary management in pediatric low-grade gliomas.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e481-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.019. Epub 2011 Apr 4. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011. PMID: 21470783
-
Low-grade gliomas in children: single institutional experience in 198 cases.Childs Nerv Syst. 2015 Sep;31(9):1447-59. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2800-9. Epub 2015 Jul 9. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015. PMID: 26156776
-
Current perspectives on diffuse midline glioma and a different role for the immune microenvironment compared to glioblastoma.J Neuroinflammation. 2022 Nov 19;19(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12974-022-02630-8. J Neuroinflammation. 2022. PMID: 36403059 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Supratentorial hemispheric ependymomas: an analysis of 109 adults for survival and prognostic factors.J Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;125(2):410-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS151187. Epub 2016 Jan 8. J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26745489 Review.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous