Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension
- PMID: 37440162
- DOI: 10.3758/s13421-023-01442-2
Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension
Abstract
The production effect-that reading aloud leads to better memory than does reading silently-has been defined narrowly with reference to memory; it has been explored largely using word lists as the material to be read and remembered. But might the benefit of production extend beyond memory and beyond individual words? In a series of four experiments, passages from reading comprehension tests served as the study material. Participants read some passages aloud and others silently. After each passage, they completed multiple-choice questions about that passage. Separating the multiple-choice questions into memory-focused versus comprehension-focused questions, we observed a consistent production benefit only for the memory-focused questions. Production clearly improves memory for text, not just for individual words, and also extends to multiple-choice testing. The overall pattern of findings fits with the distinctiveness account of production-that information read aloud stands out at study and at test from information read silently. Only when the tested information is a very close match to the studied information, as is the case for memory questions but not for comprehension questions, does production improve accuracy.
Keywords: Comprehension; Memory; Production effect; Reading; Text.
© 2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Word predictability blurs the lines between production and comprehension: Evidence from the production effect in memory.Cognition. 2020 May;198:104206. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104206. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Cognition. 2020. PMID: 32035323
-
Enhancing the production effect in memory.Memory. 2013;21(8):904-15. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.766754. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Memory. 2013. PMID: 23384885
-
Production between and within: distinctiveness and the relative magnitude of the production effect.Memory. 2021 Feb;29(2):168-179. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1868526. Epub 2021 Jan 11. Memory. 2021. PMID: 33427599
-
Remembered study mode: support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect.Memory. 2014;22(5):509-24. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.800554. Epub 2013 May 29. Memory. 2014. PMID: 23713784
-
Mechanisms underlying the production effect for singing.Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Dec;73(4):254-264. doi: 10.1037/cep0000179. Epub 2019 Aug 8. Can J Exp Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31393154
References
-
- Addpipe Development Team. (2022). Addpipe (Version July 2022) [Computer Software]. https://addpipe.com/
-
- Alonzo, J., Basaraba, D., Tindal, G., & Carriveau, R. S. (2009). They read, but how well do they understand?: An empirical look at the nuances of measuring reading comprehension. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35(1), 34–44. - DOI
-
- Barlow, M. C. (1928). The role of articulation in memorizing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 306–312. - DOI
-
- Basaraba, D., Yovanoff, P., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2013). Examining the structure of reading comprehension: Do literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension truly exist? Reading and Writing, 26(3), 349–379. - DOI
-
- Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). MIT Press. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources