Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2023 Aug 1;141(8):756-765.
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2855.

Low-Dose 0.01% Atropine Eye Drops vs Placebo for Myopia Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comment

Low-Dose 0.01% Atropine Eye Drops vs Placebo for Myopia Control: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Michael X Repka et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Importance: Controlling myopia progression is of interest worldwide. Low-dose atropine eye drops have slowed progression in children in East Asia.

Objective: To compare atropine, 0.01%, eye drops with placebo for slowing myopia progression in US children.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a randomized placebo-controlled, double-masked, clinical trial conducted from June 2018 to September 2022. Children aged 5 to 12 years were recruited from 12 community- and institution-based practices in the US. Participating children had low to moderate bilateral myopia (-1.00 diopters [D] to -6.00 D spherical equivalent refractive error [SER]).

Intervention: Eligible children were randomly assigned 2:1 to 1 eye drop of atropine, 0.01%, nightly or 1 drop of placebo. Treatment was for 24 months followed by 6 months of observation.

Main outcome and measures: Automated cycloplegic refraction was performed by masked examiners. The primary outcome was change in SER (mean of both eyes) from baseline to 24 months (receiving treatment); other outcomes included change in SER from baseline to 30 months (not receiving treatment) and change in axial length at both time points. Differences were calculated as atropine minus placebo.

Results: A total of 187 children (mean [SD] age, 10.1 [1.8] years; age range, 5.1-12.9 years; 101 female [54%]; 34 Black [18%], 20 East Asian [11%], 30 Hispanic or Latino [16%], 11 multiracial [6%], 6 West/South Asian [3%], 86 White [46%]) were included in the study. A total of 125 children (67%) received atropine, 0.01%, and 62 children (33%) received placebo. Follow-up was completed at 24 months by 119 of 125 children (95%) in the atropine group and 58 of 62 children (94%) in the placebo group. At 30 months, follow-up was completed by 118 of 125 children (94%) in the atropine group and 57 of 62 children (92%) in the placebo group. At the 24-month primary outcome visit, the adjusted mean (95% CI) change in SER from baseline was -0.82 (-0.96 to -0.68) D and -0.80 (-0.98 to -0.62) D in the atropine and placebo groups, respectively (adjusted difference = -0.02 D; 95% CI, -0.19 to +0.15 D; P = .83). At 30 months (6 months not receiving treatment), the adjusted difference in mean SER change from baseline was -0.04 D (95% CI, -0.25 to +0.17 D). Adjusted mean (95% CI) changes in axial length from baseline to 24 months were 0.44 (0.39-0.50) mm and 0.45 (0.37-0.52) mm in the atropine and placebo groups, respectively (adjusted difference = -0.002 mm; 95% CI, -0.106 to 0.102 mm). Adjusted difference in mean axial elongation from baseline to 30 months was +0.009 mm (95% CI, -0.115 to 0.134 mm).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of school-aged children in the US with low to moderate myopia, atropine, 0.01%, eye drops administered nightly when compared with placebo did not slow myopia progression or axial elongation. These results do not support use of atropine, 0.01%, eye drops to slow myopia progression or axial elongation in US children.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03334253.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Repka reported receiving grants from the National Eye Institute during the conduct of the study. Dr Weise reported receiving grants from Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG)/National Eye Institute, Bausch and Lomb, and CooperVision outside the submitted work. Mr Wu reported receiving grants from Jaeb Center for Health Research during the conduct of the study. Ms Melia reported receiving grants from National Eye Institute and nonfinancial support from Vyluma during the conduct of the study. Dr Manny reported receiving grants from PEDIG/National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Kehler reported receiving a salary from PEDIG and study visit payments from Bausch and Lomb outside the submitted work. Dr Summers reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Malcolm M. Marquis, MD, Endowed Fund for Innovation, and Research to Prevent Blindness during the conduct of the study. Dr Petersen reported receiving grants from the National Eye Institute during the conduct of the study. Mr Kraker reported receiving grants from the National Eye Institute and PEDIG/National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Holmes reported receiving grants from National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Cotter reported receiving grants from the National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health and Vyluma outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Flow Diagram
Completed visits included both in-office and virtual visits at 6, 12, and 18 months; all visits at 24 months and 30 months were completed in office.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Adjusted Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error (SER) and Axial Length (and 95% CI) Between Baseline and Outcome Visits (Outcome − Baseline) (Mean of Right and Left Eyes)
The change in SER (diopter [D]) from baseline adjusted for baseline SER, age, iris color (brown vs nonbrown), and race (East Asian vs non–East Asian participants). The adjusted treatment group difference of mean change in axial length from baseline adjusted for baseline axial length, age, iris color (brown vs nonbrown), and race (East Asian vs non–East Asian participants).

Comment on

  • Atropine, 0.01%, for Myopia Control.
    Walline JJ, Berntsen DA. Walline JJ, et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 1;141(8):766-767. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3076. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37440252 No abstract available.

References

    1. Williams KM, Bertelsen G, Cumberland P, et al. ; European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium . Increasing prevalence of myopia in Europe and the impact of education. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1489-1497. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL III. Increased prevalence of myopia in the US between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(12):1632-1639. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.303 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. . Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036-1042. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Eye Institute . Nearsightedness (myopia) tables. Accessed June 2, 2022. https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/eye-health-data-and-stati...
    1. Kleinstein RN, Sinnott LT, Jones-Jordan LA, Sims J, Zadnik K; Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error Study Group . New cases of myopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(10):1274-1279. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1449 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data