Public Opinion about Management Strategies for a Low-Profile Species across Multiple Jurisdictions: Whitebark Pine in the Northern Rockies
- PMID: 37441680
- PMCID: PMC10338023
- DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10094
Public Opinion about Management Strategies for a Low-Profile Species across Multiple Jurisdictions: Whitebark Pine in the Northern Rockies
Abstract
1. As public land managers seek to adopt and implement conservation measures aimed at reversing or slowing the negative effects of climate change, they are looking to understand public opinion regarding different management strategies. 2. This study explores drivers of attitudes toward different management strategies (i.e., no management, protection, and restoration) for a low-profile but keystone tree species, the whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis), in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Since the whitebark pine species has a range that traverses different federal land designations, we examine whether attitudes toward management strategies differ by jurisdiction (i.e., wilderness or federal lands more generally). 3. We conducted a web and mail survey of residents from Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming, with 1,617 valid responses and a response rate of 16%. 4. We find that active management strategies have substantially higher levels of support than does no management, with relatively little differentiation across protection and restoration activities or across different land designations. We also find that support for management strategies is not influenced by values (political ideology) but is influenced by beliefs (about material vs. post-material environmental orientation, global climate change, and federal spending for public lands) and some measures of experience (e.g., knowledge of threats). 5. This study helps land managers understand that support for active management of the whitebark pine species is considerable and nonpartisan and that beliefs and experience with whitebark pine trees are important for support.
Keywords: Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE); New Environmental Paradigm; forests; human dimensions; management strategies; public land management; public lands; public opinion; whitebark pine.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Ajzen I (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T - DOI
-
- Amberson JT, Keville MP, & Nelson CR (2018). Effects of Disturbance on Tree Community Dynamics in Whitebark Pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.) Ecosystems . Forests (19994907), 9(9), 566. doi:10.3390/f9090566 - DOI
-
- Bauer N, Wallner A, & Hunziker M (2009). The change of European landscapes: human-nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9), 2910–2920. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.021 - DOI - PubMed
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials