Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;2(3):784-796.
doi: 10.1002/pan3.10094. Epub 2020 May 17.

Public Opinion about Management Strategies for a Low-Profile Species across Multiple Jurisdictions: Whitebark Pine in the Northern Rockies

Affiliations

Public Opinion about Management Strategies for a Low-Profile Species across Multiple Jurisdictions: Whitebark Pine in the Northern Rockies

Elizabeth A Shanahan et al. People Nat (Hoboken). 2020 Sep.

Abstract

1. As public land managers seek to adopt and implement conservation measures aimed at reversing or slowing the negative effects of climate change, they are looking to understand public opinion regarding different management strategies. 2. This study explores drivers of attitudes toward different management strategies (i.e., no management, protection, and restoration) for a low-profile but keystone tree species, the whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis), in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Since the whitebark pine species has a range that traverses different federal land designations, we examine whether attitudes toward management strategies differ by jurisdiction (i.e., wilderness or federal lands more generally). 3. We conducted a web and mail survey of residents from Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming, with 1,617 valid responses and a response rate of 16%. 4. We find that active management strategies have substantially higher levels of support than does no management, with relatively little differentiation across protection and restoration activities or across different land designations. We also find that support for management strategies is not influenced by values (political ideology) but is influenced by beliefs (about material vs. post-material environmental orientation, global climate change, and federal spending for public lands) and some measures of experience (e.g., knowledge of threats). 5. This study helps land managers understand that support for active management of the whitebark pine species is considerable and nonpartisan and that beliefs and experience with whitebark pine trees are important for support.

Keywords: Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE); New Environmental Paradigm; forests; human dimensions; management strategies; public land management; public lands; public opinion; whitebark pine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The range of whitebark pine in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem across multiple jurisdictions
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Changes in likelihood for supporting or opposing particular management strategies

References

    1. Abrams J, Kelly E, Shindler B, & Wilton J (2005). Value Orientation and Forest Management: The Forest Health Debate. Environmental Management, 36(4), 495–505. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-7256-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ajzen I (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T - DOI
    1. Amberson JT, Keville MP, & Nelson CR (2018). Effects of Disturbance on Tree Community Dynamics in Whitebark Pine (Pinus albicaulis Engelm.) Ecosystems . Forests (19994907), 9(9), 566. doi:10.3390/f9090566 - DOI
    1. Barry SJ (2014). Using Social Media to Discover Public Values, Interests, and Perceptions about Cattle Grazing on Park Lands. Environmental Management, 53(2), 454–464. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0216-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer N, Wallner A, & Hunziker M (2009). The change of European landscapes: human-nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9), 2910–2920. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.021 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources