Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 26;145(29):16045-16057.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c04376. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

Net-1,2-Hydrogen Atom Transfer of Amidyl Radicals: Toward the Synthesis of 1,2-Diamine Derivatives

Affiliations

Net-1,2-Hydrogen Atom Transfer of Amidyl Radicals: Toward the Synthesis of 1,2-Diamine Derivatives

Yonggang Jiang et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) processes are among the most useful approaches for the selective construction of C(sp3)-C(sp3) bonds. 1,5-HAT with heteroatom-centered radicals (O, N) have been well established and are favored relative to other 1,n-HAT processes. In comparison, net 1,2-HAT processes have been observed infrequently. Herein, the first amidyl radicalls are reported that preferentially undergo a net 1,2-HAT over 1,5-HAT. Beginning with single electron transfer from 2-azaallyl anions to N-alkyl N-aryloxy amides, the latter generate amidyl radicals. The amidyl radical undergoes a net-1,2-HAT to generate a C-centered radical that participates in an intermolecular radical-radical coupling with the 2-azaallyl radical to generate 1,2-diamine derivatives. Mechanistic and EPR experiments point to radical intermediates. Density functional theory calculations provide support for a base-assisted, stepwise-1,2-HAT process. It is proposed that the generation of amidyl radicals under basic conditions can be greatly expanded to access α-amino C-centered radicals that will serve as valuable synthetic intermediates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Generation of azaallyl radical 8 via deprotonation of 2a followed by SET to 1a. Free energies were computed using UM06/6–311+G(d,p)-CPCM(DMSO)//UB3LYP/6–31G(d). See Figure S7 for energetics with UM06–2X/6–311+G(d,p)-CPCM(DMSO)//UB3LYP/6–31G(d).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Generation of radical-radical coupling product 3aa via base-assisted, stepwise 1,2-HAT of 9a. Free energies were computed using UM06/6–311+G(d,p)-CPCM(DMSO)//UB3LYP/6–31G(d). See Figure S12 for energetics with UM06–2X/6–311+G(d,p)-CPCM(DMSO)//UB3LYP/6–31G(d).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Generation of amidyl radical 11s via indirect, base-assisted 1,2-HAT of 9s. Direct 1,2-, 1,5-, and 1,6-HAT processes are also shown. Free energies were computed using UM06/6–311+G(d,p)-CPCM(DMSO)//UB3LYP/6–31G(d). See Figure S15 for energetics with UM06–2X/6–311+G(d,p)-CPCM(DMSO)//UB3LYP/6–31G(d).
Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
Reactions of heteroatom-centered radicals. a. 1,5- vs. 1,2-HAT processes with heteroatom centered radicals (X). b. Transition-metal-catalyzed 1,2-hydrogen atom transfer (1,2-HAT) of heteroatom-centered radicals. c. Net-1,2-HAT of aminyl radicals in biological systems.
Scheme 2.
Scheme 2.
Reaction development. a. SET of 2-azaallyl anions with various electrophiles followed by radical-radical coupling. b. Generation of amidyl radicals, net-1,2-HAT and radical-radical coupling to generate 1,2-diamine derivatives (This work).
Scheme 3.
Scheme 3.
Gram-scale synthesis and hydrolysis reactions. a. Gram-scale sequential one-pot synthesis of 3da and 3oa. b. Hydrolysis of the products to access diamines 4da and 4oa.
Scheme 4.
Scheme 4.
EPR spectrum of the PBN-trapped carbon-centered radical.
Scheme 5.
Scheme 5.
Possible paths. a. Base-promoted elimination mechanism. b. Amidyl radicals α-C(sp3)–H coupling via net-1,2-HAT.
Scheme 6.
Scheme 6.
Control experiments. a. Radical trapping experiment. b. Reaction in the absence of ketimine. c. Less reducing 2-azaallyl anion.
Scheme 7.
Scheme 7.
Reaction of radical clock 1q.
Scheme 8.
Scheme 8.
Cross-over experiments.
Scheme 9.
Scheme 9.
Deprotonation/protonation mechanism to net 1,2-HAT.
Scheme 10.
Scheme 10.
Overview of mechanistic probes. a. 1,2-HAT vs. 1,5-HAT. b. 1,2-HAT against benzylic 1,5-HAT. c. 1,5-HAT.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. White MC, Adding Aliphatic C−H Bond Oxidations to Synthesis. Science 2012, 335 (6070), 807–809. - PubMed
    1. He J; Wasa M; Chan KSL; Shao Q; Yu JQ, Palladium-Catalyzed Transformations of Alkyl C-H Bonds. Chem. Rev 2017, 117 (13), 8754–8786. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang Z; Lim HN; Mo F; Young MC; Dong G, Transition metal-catalyzed ketone-directed or mediated C-H functionalization. Chem. Soc. Rev 2015, 44 (21), 7764–7786. - PubMed
    1. Newhouse T; Baran PS, If C-H bonds could talk: selective C-H bond oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011, 50 (15), 3362–3374. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yamaguchi J; Yamaguchi AD; Itami K, Funktionalisierung von C-H-Bindungen: neue Synthesemethoden für Naturstoffe und Pharmazeutika. Angew. Chem 2012, 124 (36), 9092–9142.

LinkOut - more resources