Evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle strength and width of hernia defect in patients undergoing incisional hernia surgery
- PMID: 37442870
- DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02834-8
Evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle strength and width of hernia defect in patients undergoing incisional hernia surgery
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the strength status of the rectus abdominis muscle in patients with incisional hernia and the relationship between the width of the hernia defect and the strength of the rectus abdominis muscle.
Methods: This is a observational cohort study of patients with medial line incisional hernia (July-October 2022), classified as W2 according to the European Hernia Society (EHS). The data collected were demographic and clinical characteristics related to hernia, and measure of the rectus abdominis muscle strength using an isokinetic dynamometer and a strain gauge. We analyzed the relationship between hernia width and rectus abdominis muscle strength with correlation tests to adjustment by age, sex, BMI, and body composition.
Results: A total of 40 patients (64% female) with a mean age of 57.62 years (SD 11) were enrolled in the study. The mean BMI was 29.18 (SD 5.06), with a mean percentage of fat mass of 37.8% (SD 8.47) and a mean percentage of muscle mass of 60.33% (SD 6.43). The maximum width of the hernia defect was 6.59 cm (SD 1.54). In the male group, the mean bending force moment (ISOK_PT) was 94.01 Nw m (SD 34.58), bending force moment relative to body weight (ISOK_PT_Weight) was 103.32 Nw m (SD 37.48), and peak force (PK_90) was 184.71 N (SD 47.01). In the female group, these values were 58.11 Nw m (SD 29.41), 66.48 Nw m (SD 32.44), and 152.50 N (SD 48.49), respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in the relationship between the data obtained with the isokinetic dynamometer and sex (p = 0.002), as well as between the data obtained with the isokinetic dynamometer and age (p = 0.006). Patients in the 90th percentile (P90) of rectus abdominis muscle strength also had smaller hernia defect widths (p = 0.048).
Conclusions: In this study, age and sex were identified as the most statistically significant predictor variables for rectus abdominis muscle strength. The width of the hernia defect exhibited a trend towards statistical significance.
Keywords: Incisional hernia; Isokinetic dynamometer; Rectus abdominis muscle strength; Strain gauge; Surgery.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Histology and Function of the Rectus Abdominis Muscle in Patients With Incisional Hernia.J Surg Res. 2020 Sep;253:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.03.033. Epub 2020 May 6. J Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 32387572
-
Isokinetic strength of the trunk flexor muscles after surgical repair for incisional hernia.Hernia. 2010 Jun;14(3):243-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0627-6. Epub 2010 Jan 21. Hernia. 2010. PMID: 20091329 Free PMC article.
-
Atrophic change of the abdominal rectus muscle significantly influences the onset of parastomal hernias beyond existing risk factors after end colostomy.Hernia. 2021 Feb;25(1):141-148. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02192-9. Epub 2020 May 12. Hernia. 2021. PMID: 32399627
-
CT-measured hernia parameters can predict component separation: a cross-sectional study from China.Hernia. 2023 Aug;27(4):979-986. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02761-8. Epub 2023 Mar 18. Hernia. 2023. PMID: 36934216
-
Inquiries into the Frequency of Hernia, According to Sex and Age, and in Relation to Population.West J Med Surg. 1844 Apr;1(4):315-339. West J Med Surg. 1844. PMID: 38208255 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Impact of incisional hernia on abdominal wall strength.BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3):zrae045. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae045. BJS Open. 2024. PMID: 38818958 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Biomechanics of the abdominal wall before and after ventral hernia repair using dynamic MRI.Hernia. 2025 May 24;29(1):185. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03337-4. Hernia. 2025. PMID: 40411602
References
-
- Nachiappan S, Markar S, Karthikesalingam A, Ziprin P, Faiz O (2013) Prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients undergoing elective laparotomy: a systematic review. World J Surg 37(8):1861–1871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2046-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dietz UA, Menzel S, Lock J, Wiegering A (2018) The treatment of incisional hernia. Dtsch Arztebl Int 115(3):31–37. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0031 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T, Cornish J, Harries R, Stimpson A, Davies L, Glasbey JC, Frewer KA, Frewer NC, Russell D, Russell I, Torkington J (2015) Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138745 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Kössler-Ebs JB, Grummich K, Jensen K, Hüttner FJ, Müller-Stich B, Seiler CM, Knebel P, Büchler MW, Diener MK (2016) Incisional hernia rates after laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery—a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 40(10):2319–2330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3520-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nassif AT, Nagano TA, Villela IR, Simonetti GR, Dias BF, Freitas ACT (2020) Incisional hernioplasty techniques: analysis after open bariatric surgery. Arq Bras Cir Dig 33(2):e1517. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020200002e1517 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources