Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):235.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02197-8.

Analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jie Li et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a promising regional technique for analgesia in thoracic surgery. Till now, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored the effectiveness of SAPB for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), but the sample sizes were small and conclusions remained in controversy. Therefore, we conducted the present systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: RCTs evaluating the analgesic performance of SAPB, comparing to control methods (no block, placebo or local infiltration anesthesia), in patients undergoing VATS were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from inception to December 31, 2022. Mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated for postoperative pain scores at various time points, postoperative opioid consumption and length of hospital stay. Pooled relative risk (RR) with 95%CI were calculated for the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and dizziness. A random-effect model was applied.

Results: A total of 12 RCTs (837 participants) were finally included. Compared to control group, SAPB had significant reductions of postoperative pain scores at 2 h (MD = -1.58, 95%CI: -1.86 to -1.31, P < 0.001), 6 h (MD = -2.06, 95%CI: -2.74 to -1.38, P < 0.001), 12 h (MD = -1.72, 95%CI: -2.30 to -1.14, P < 0.001) and 24 h (MD = -1.03, 95%CI: -1.55 to -0.52, P < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, SAPB conferred a fewer postoperative opioid consumption (MD = -7.3 mg of intravenous morphine equivalent, 95%CI: -10.16 to -4.44, P < 0.001) and lower incidence of PONV (RR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.41 to 0.77, P < 0.001). There was no difference between both groups regarding length of hospital stay and risk of dizziness.

Conclusion: SAPB shows an excellent performance in postoperative pain management in patients undergoing VATS by reducing pains scores, postoperative opioid consumption and incidence of PONV. However, due to huge heterogeneity, more well-designed, large-scale RCTs are needed to verify these findings in the future.

Keywords: Analgesia; Meta-analysis; Postoperative pain scores; Serratus anterior plane block; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of literature search
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias summary
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Risk of bias graph
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for meta-analysis of postoperative pain scores at 2 h
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot for meta-analysis of postoperative pain scores at 6 h
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot for meta-analysis of postoperative pain scores at 12 h
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Forest plot for meta-analysis of postoperative pain scores at 24 h
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Forest plot for meta-analysis of postoperative opioid consumption
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Forest plot for meta-analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reuben SS, Yalavarthy L. Preventing the development of chronic pain after thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22(6):890–903. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.02.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elmore B, Nguyen V, Blank R, Yount K, Lau C. Pain management following thoracic surgery. Thorac Surg Clin. 2015;25(4):393–409. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2015.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kolettas A, Lazaridis G, Baka S, Mpoukovinas I, Karavasilis V, Kioumis I, Pitsiou G, Papaiwannou A, Lampaki S, Karavergou A, et al. Postoperative pain management. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(Suppl 1):S62–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sedrakyan A, van der Meulen J, Lewsey J, Treasure T. Video assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of pneumothorax and lung resections: systematic review of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38243.440486.55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flores RM, Park BJ, Dycoco J, Aronova A, Hirth Y, Rizk NP, Bains M, Downey RJ, Rusch VW. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138(1):11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.030. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources