Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):655.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11142-4.

Management of metastatic melanoma in Texas: disparities in the utilization of immunotherapy following the regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Affiliations

Management of metastatic melanoma in Texas: disparities in the utilization of immunotherapy following the regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Olajumoke A Olateju et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The utilization of modern-immunotherapies, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has increased markedly in patients with metastatic melanoma over the past decade and are recommended as standard treatment. Given their increasing adoption in routine care for melanoma, understanding patient access to immunotherapy and patterns of its use in Texas is crucial as it remains one of the few states without Medicaid expansion and with high rates of the uninsured population. The objectives of this study were to examine the trend in the utilization of immunotherapy and to determine factors associated with immunotherapy utilization among patients with metastatic melanoma in the era of ICIs in Texas.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) database. The cohort comprised of adult (≥ 18 years) patients with metastatic melanoma diagnosed between June 2011 and December 2018. The trend in immunotherapy utilization was assessed by determining the proportion of patients receiving immunotherapy each year. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) in immunotherapy utilization was assessed using joinpoint regression, while multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between patient characteristics and immunotherapy receipt.

Results: A total of 1,795 adult patients with metastatic melanoma were identified from the TCR. Immunotherapy utilization was higher among younger patients, those with no comorbidities, and patients with private insurance. Multivariable analysis showed that the likelihood of receipt of immunotherapy decreased with older age [(adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR), 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89- 0.93, p = 0.001], living in high poverty neighborhood (aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.44 - 0.66, p < 0.0001), having Medicaid (aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 - 0.73, p = 0.02), being uninsured (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.64, p = 0.01), and having comorbidities (CCI score 1: aOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34 - 0.71, p = 0.003; CCI score ≥ 2: aOR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16 - 0.56, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study identified sociodemographic and socioeconomic disparities in access to immunotherapy in Texas, highlighting the need for policies such as Medicaid expansion that would increase equitable access to this innovative therapy.

Keywords: Access; Disparity; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Melanoma; Texas; Utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient selection flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Temporal trends in immunotherapy utilization for patients with metastatic melanoma. A Overall immunotherapy utilization (B) Immunotherapy utilization by age category (C) Immunotherapy utilization by sex (D) Immunotherapy utilization by race (E) Immunotherapy utilization by insurance type (F) Immunotherapy utilization by comorbidity index. Figure 2f: There were no patients with 2 or more comorbidities in 2017–2018, and with comorbidity score of 1 in 2018
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot showing association between patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and immunotherapy utilization. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ref = reference. Time to treatment initiation means the time from diagnosis to receipt of the first treatment course

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Verma V, Haque W, Cushman TR, Lin C, Simone CB, Chang JY, et al. Racial and insurance-related disparities in delivery of immunotherapy-type compounds in the United States. J Immunother. 2019;42:55–64. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000253. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rotte A, Bhandaru M, Zhou Y, McElwee KJ. Immunotherapy of melanoma: present options and future promises. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015;34:115–128. doi: 10.1007/s10555-014-9542-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Cancer Institute B. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin . https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html. Accessed 19 Jul 2022.
    1. Lim J, Cho E, Lee K, Choi Y, Seo Y, Jeon H, et al. Current immunotherapy approaches for malignant melanoma. BioChip J. 2019;13:105–14. doi: 10.1007/s13206-019-3108-8. - DOI
    1. Vasekar MK, Agbese E, Leslie D. The value of immunotherapy: Comparison of annual cost per patient receiving immunotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. 2020;38 15_suppl: e19364–e19364. 10.1200/JCO20203815_suppl.e19364.

Substances