Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 23;13(13):2080.
doi: 10.3390/ani13132080.

Can Interacting with Animals Improve Executive Functions? A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Can Interacting with Animals Improve Executive Functions? A Systematic Review

Deanna Tepper et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the potential benefits of using human-animal interactions to improve executive functions: cognitive processes that allow individuals to plan, solve problems, and self-regulate behaviour. To date, no comprehensive review has been conducted. The purpose of this study was to evaluate existing literature, adopting broad inclusion criteria. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 16 papers were identified from peer-reviewed literature. Additional papers were identified from grey literature, including 6 dissertations and 1 thesis. A review of these 23 studies found that human-animal interactions and executive functions are investigated in three main ways: (1) exploring the potential benefits of the human-pet relationship, (2) exploring the impact of an animal's presence during administration of executive function tests, and (3) evaluating the efficacy of animal-assisted services (e.g., animal-assisted therapy) on executive functions. Five of the included studies reported a significant improvement across all measured domains of executive functions, but effect sizes were underreported. Comparatively, 9 studies reported mixed findings, d = 0.32-0.55, while 8 studies reported no significant results. The overall rigour of the research was limited, with great heterogeneity between the study methodologies and outcome measures used. It is recommended that future studies utilise high-quality research methodologies through the use of randomisation, pre- and postmeasures, and appropriate control conditions, where possible.

Keywords: adolescence; animal-assisted services; children; cognition; development; human–animal relationship; human–pet relationship; older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Article-selection process detailing the number of articles included and excluded at each step of the review using the PRISMA flow guidelines. ‘Other cognitive measure’ refers to the use of the measures such as the Mini-Mental State Examination, which contains an item measuring executive functions but provides a total cognitive score.

References

    1. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013;64:135–168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diamond A. Executive functions. In: Gallagher A., Bulteau C., Cohen D., Michaud J.L., editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020. pp. 225–240. - PubMed
    1. Josman N., Meyer S. Conceptualisation and use of executive functions in paediatrics: A scoping review of occupational therapy literature. Aust. Occup. Ther. J. 2019;66:77–90. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12525. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Best J.R., Miller P.H. A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Dev. 2010;81:1641–1660. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diamond A. The early development of executive functions. In: Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., editors. Lifespan Cognition: Mechanisms of Change. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2006. pp. 70–95.

LinkOut - more resources