Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 28;13(13):2140.
doi: 10.3390/ani13132140.

Effects of Individual and Pair Housing of Calves on Short-Term Health and Behaviour on a UK Commercial Dairy Farm

Affiliations

Effects of Individual and Pair Housing of Calves on Short-Term Health and Behaviour on a UK Commercial Dairy Farm

Sophie A Mahendran et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Social pair housing of calves has previously demonstrated positive impacts for calves, so this study aimed to compare the health and behaviour of calves kept in individual compared to pair housing on a single commercial UK dairy farm. A total of 457 Holstein and Jersey heifer calves were recruited and systematically allocated to individual and pair housing. Weekly visits were conducted up to 8 weeks of age, with weight and presence of clinical disease measured using both a standardized scoring system and thoracic ultrasonography. A subset of calves (n = 90) had accelerometers attached to monitor activity, with CCTV placed above a further 16 pens to allow behavioural assessments to be made via continuous focal sampling at 1 and 5 weeks of age. During the study, there was a mortality rate of 2.8%, and an average daily liveweight gain (ADLG) of 0.72 kg/day, with no significant effect of housing group (p = 0.76). However, individually housed calves had increased odds of developing disease (OR = 1.88, p = 0.014). Accelerometer data showed that housing group had no effect on lying times, with a mean of 18 h 11 min per day (SD 39 min) spent lying down. The motion index was significantly higher in pair-housed calves (F1,83 = 440.3, p < 0.01), potentially due to more social play behaviour. The total time engaged in non-nutritive oral behaviours (NNOBs) was not impacted by housing group (p = 0.72). Pair-housed calves split their time conducting NNOBs equally between inanimate objects and on their pen mates' body. Individually housed calves spent significantly more time with their head out of the front of the pen (p = 0.006), and also engaged in more self-grooming than pair-housed calves (p = 0.017), possibly due to a lack of socialization. The overall findings of this study indicate that within a UK commercial dairy management system, pair-housed calves were healthier and more active than individually housed calves, while housing group did not influence ADLG or the occurrence of NNOBs.

Keywords: behaviour; calf housing; health; individual; non-nutritive abnormal oral behaviour; pair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Assessment of the effect of pre-weaning housing group on the ADLG of the calves within three separate time periods prior to weaning. The mean ADLG in weeks 1–3 was 0.41 ± 0.1 kg/day (SEM), in weeks 4–6 was 0.87 ± 0.01 kg/day and in weeks 7–8 was 0.89 ± 0.03 kg/day. White columns indicate individually housed calves and grey columns indicate pair-housed calves.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean lying times of calves over time, showing a reducing trend. Error lines are two standard errors, with a line of best fit. Calves were disbudded around 28–35 days of age, which may account for the reduced mean lying times seen at this time.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean motion index (MI) of calves over time, showing a reduction in MI later in the year. Error lines are two standard errors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean novel object approach time of calves by month of birth. Error lines are two standard errors.

References

    1. Barrington G.M., Gay J.M., Evermann J.F. Biosecurity for Neonatal Gastrointestinal Diseases. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2002;18:7–34. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00005-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callan R.J., Garry F.B. Biosecurity and Bovine Respiratory Disease. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2002;18:57–77. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00004-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. USDA . Dairy 2014: Dairy Cattle Management Practices in the United States, 2014. United States Department of Agriculture; Washington, DC, USA: 2016.
    1. Klein-Jöbstl D., Arnholdt T., Sturmlechner F., Iwersen M., Drillich M. Results of an Online Questionnaire to Survey Calf Management Practices on Dairy Cattle Breeding Farms in Austria and to Estimate Differences in Disease Incidences Depending on Farm Structure and Management Practices. Acta Vet. Scand. 2015;57:44. doi: 10.1186/s13028-015-0134-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinnott A.M., Bokkers E.A.M., Murphy J.P., Kennedy E. A Survey of Calf Housing Facilities Pre-Weaning, Management Practices and Farmer Perceptions of Calf Welfare on Irish Dairy Farms. Animals. 2023;13:1019. doi: 10.3390/ani13061019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources