A Rapid Review of Sociocultural Dimensions in Nigeria's Solid Waste Management Approach
- PMID: 37444093
- PMCID: PMC10341782
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20136245
A Rapid Review of Sociocultural Dimensions in Nigeria's Solid Waste Management Approach
Abstract
Against the background of an arguable dearth of scholarship on the sociocultural dimensions of Nigeria's solid waste management strategies and practices, this rapid review searched for evidence in the literature. A rapid evidence review and qualitative meta-summary procedure were implemented to utilize the rigor of systematic literature review that met the timelines and limited funding available for this study. It is more appropriate to identify, extract, and synthesize a mixture of qualitative and/or quantitative empirical evidence in the literature. This rapid review found little substantive evidence of scholarly sociocultural approaches in Nigeria's solid waste management. It also discovered constant factors of inadequate and weak multidisciplinary or non-holistic approaches to driving innovation and effective social impact in Nigeria's solid waste management practices. The results were interpreted vis-à-vis the need to leverage the social sciences, particularly the range and scope of social work practice configurations and possibilities, to scientifically advance and substantially accelerate the implementation of evidence-based policy and practice in Nigeria's solid waste management system. This rapid review concluded that the negative results are due to the insufficient conceptual and theoretical bases for Nigeria's solid waste management strategies and/or practices.
Keywords: circular economy; interdisciplinarity; recycling; refuse management; sociocultural intervention; sustainability.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- UK Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Applying the Waste Hierarchy: Evidence Summary. [(accessed on 8 June 2023)];2011 Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....
-
- Deutz P., Frostick L.E. Reconciling policy, practice, and theorisations of waste management. Geogr. J. 2009;175:247–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00338.x. - DOI
-
- Onwuegbuzie A.J., Teddlie C. A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori A., Teddlie C., editors. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Sage; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2003. pp. 351–383.
-
- Sandelowski M., Barroso J. Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2006.
-
- Collins A.M., Coughlin D., Miller J., Kirk S. The Production of Quick Scoping Reviews and Rapid Evidence Assessments: A How to Guide. [(accessed on 2 February 2023)];2015 Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous