Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 5;12(13):2607.
doi: 10.3390/foods12132607.

Nordic Crops as Alternatives to Soy-An Overview of Nutritional, Sensory, and Functional Properties

Affiliations
Review

Nordic Crops as Alternatives to Soy-An Overview of Nutritional, Sensory, and Functional Properties

Jaqueline Auer et al. Foods. .

Abstract

Soy (Glycine max) is used in a wide range of products and plays a major role in replacing animal-based products. Since the cultivation of soy is limited by cold climates, this review assessed the nutritional, sensory, and functional properties of three alternative cold-tolerant crops (faba bean (Vicia faba), yellow pea (Pisum sativum), and oat (Avena sativa)). Lower protein quality compared with soy and the presence of anti-nutrients are nutritional problems with all three crops, but different methods to adjust for these problems are available. Off-flavors in all pulses, including soy, and in cereals impair the sensory properties of the resulting food products, and few mitigation methods are successful. The functional properties of faba bean, pea, and oat are comparable to those of soy, which makes them usable for 3D printing, gelation, emulsification, and extrusion. Enzymatic treatment, fermentation, and fibrillation can be applied to improve the nutritional value, sensory attributes, and functional properties of all the three crops assessed, making them suitable for replacing soy in a broad range of products, although more research is needed on all attributes.

Keywords: faba bean (Vicia faba); oat (Avena sativa); pea (Pisum sativum); plant-based food; plant-based proteins; soy alternative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Xu X., Sharma P., Shu S., Lin T.S., Ciais P., Tubiello F.N., Smith P., Campbell N., Jain A.K. Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Animal-Based Foods Are Twice Those of Plant-Based Foods. Nat. Food. 2021;2:724–732. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joshi V., Kumar S. Meat Analogues: Plant Based Alternatives to Meat Products—A Review. Int. J. Food Ferment. Technol. 2015;5:107. doi: 10.5958/2277-9396.2016.00001.5. - DOI
    1. Vatansever S., Tulbek M.C., Riaz M.N. Low- and High-Moisture Extrusion of Pulse Proteins as Plant-Based Meat Ingredients: A Review. Cereal Foods World. 2020;65:12–14. doi: 10.1094/cfw-65-4-0038. - DOI
    1. Day L. Proteins from Land Plants—Potential Resources for Human Nutrition and Food Security. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013;32:25–42. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2013.05.005. - DOI
    1. Sethi S., Tyagi S.K., Anurag R.K. Plant-Based Milk Alternatives an Emerging Segment of Functional Beverages: A Review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;53:3408–3423. doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2328-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources