End-of-Life Care in the Last Three Months before Death in Older Patients with Cancer in Belgium: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data Linkage
- PMID: 37444458
- PMCID: PMC10340177
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133349
End-of-Life Care in the Last Three Months before Death in Older Patients with Cancer in Belgium: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data Linkage
Abstract
This study aims to describe end-of-life (EOL) care in older patients with cancer and investigate the association between geriatric assessment (GA) results and specialized palliative care (SPC) use. Older patients with a new cancer diagnosis (2009-2015) originally included in a previous multicentric study were selected if they died before the end of follow-up (2019). At the time of cancer diagnosis, patients underwent geriatric screening with Geriatric 8 (G8) followed by GA in case of a G8 score ≤14/17. These data were linked to the cancer registry and healthcare reimbursement data for follow-up. EOL care was assessed in the last three months before death, and associations were analyzed using logistic regression. A total of 3546 deceased older patients with cancer with a median age of 79 years at diagnosis were included. Breast, colon, and lung cancer were the most common diagnoses. In the last three months of life, 76.3% were hospitalized, 49.1% had an emergency department visit, and 43.5% received SPC. In total, 55.0% died in the hospital (38.5% in a non-palliative care unit and 16.4% in a palliative care unit). In multivariable analyses, functional and cognitive impairment at cancer diagnosis was associated with less SPC. Further research on optimizing EOL healthcare utilization and broadening access to SPC is needed.
Keywords: geriatric oncology; population-based data; specialized palliative care; terminal healthcare utilization.
Conflict of interest statement
L.D.’s institution received a research grant from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from Roche; lecture fees from Roche, BMS, MSD, Servier, and Sanofi; travel support from Roche, Astra-Zeneca, and MSD; and advisory board fees from MSD, BMS, and Astra-Zeneca. P.R.D.’s institution received a research grant from Pfizer. P.R.D. received consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck/Pfizer, and Ipsen; lecture fee from Bayer; travel support from Janssen; and owns stock in Alkermes and Biocartis Group. V.V. received lecture fees from Institut Bordet, and MSD; travel support from Ipsen, and Janssen; and advisory board fees from Janssen, Astellas, and MSD. G.J.’s institution received research grants from Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer. G.J. received consulting fees, lecture fees, travel support and/or advisory board fees from Novartis, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Abbvie, Seagen, Medimmune, Merck, and Diaccurate. J.F.’s institution received advisory board fees and/or lecture fees from Pfizer, GSK, Merck, and Janssen. H.W.’s institution received research grants from Roche, Novartis, and Gilead; and received consulting fees, lecture fees and/or travel support from Abbvie, Daiichi, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Astra-Zeneca, EISAI, Immutep Pty, MSD, Astra-Zeneca Ireland, and Relay Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interest. The funders had no role in the study’s design; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures




References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources