Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 27;15(13):3371.
doi: 10.3390/cancers15133371.

Examining Final-Administered Medication as a Measure of Data Quality: A Comparative Analysis of Death Data with the Central Cancer Registry in Republic of Korea

Affiliations

Examining Final-Administered Medication as a Measure of Data Quality: A Comparative Analysis of Death Data with the Central Cancer Registry in Republic of Korea

Yae Won Tak et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Death is a crucial outcome in retrospective cohort studies, serving as a criterion for analyzing mortality in a database. This study aimed to assess the quality of extracted death data and investigate the potential of the final-administered medication as a variable to quantify accuracy for the validation dataset. Electronic health records from both an in-hospital and the Korean Central Cancer Registry were used for this study. The gold standard was established by examining the differences between the dates of in-hospital deaths and cancer-registered deaths. Cosine similarity was employed to quantify the final-administered medication similarities between the gold standard and other cohorts. The gold standard was determined as patients who died in the hospital after 2006 and whose final hospital visit/discharge date and death date differed by 0 or 1 day. For all three criteria-(a) cancer stage, (b) cancer type, and (c) type of final visit-there was a positive correlation between mortality rates and the similarities of the final-administered medication. This study introduces a measure that can provide additional accurate information regarding death and differentiates the reliability of the dataset.

Keywords: data accuracy; data quality; death; mortality; public data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Operating systems of death databases by institution [12].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of EHR data acquired from the ABLE system.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Selection of the validation dataset with the exclusion criteria.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The number of in-hospital and cancer-registered deaths over time.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship between mortality rate and regrouped cancer stages.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Relationship between mortality rate and cancer types.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reps J.M., Rijnbeek P.R., Ryan P.B. Identifying the DEAD: Development and Validation of a Patient-Level Model to Predict Death Status in Population-Level Claims Data. Drug Saf. 2019;42:1377–1386. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00827-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gallagher A.M., Dedman D., Padmanabhan S., Leufkens H.G.M., de Vries F. The accuracy of date of death recording in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database in England compared with the Office for National Statistics death registrations. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2019;28:563–569. doi: 10.1002/pds.4747. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iburg K.M., Mikkelsen L., Richards N. Assessment of the quality of cause-of-death data in Greenland, 2006–2015. Scand. J. Public Health. 2020;48:801–808. doi: 10.1177/1403494819890990. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Turchin A., Shubina M., Murphy S.N. I am Not Dead Yet: Identification of False-Positive Matches to Death Master File. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2010;2010:807–811. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harshfield A., Abel G.A., Barclay S., Payne R.A. Do GPs accurately record date of death? A UK observational analysis. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care. 2018;10:e24. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001514. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources