Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 26;11(13):1855.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131855.

Age-Related Quality of Life and Psychosocial Impact of Chin Asymmetry in Adolescents and Young Adults Undergoing Orthodontic and Orthognathic Correction

Serban Talpos  1 , Marius Pricop  1 , Camelia Szuhanek  2 , Robert Avramut  3 , Nicoleta Nikolajevic-Stoican  3 , Raluca Maracineanu  3 , Roxana Talpos  4 , Tareq Hajaj  5 , Malina Popa  6
Affiliations

Age-Related Quality of Life and Psychosocial Impact of Chin Asymmetry in Adolescents and Young Adults Undergoing Orthodontic and Orthognathic Correction

Serban Talpos et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Craniofacial asymmetry can have significant psychosocial implications, affecting the quality of life in adolescents and young adults. This study aimed to assess the impact of age and complexity of craniofacial asymmetry on quality of life and psychosocial outcomes in patients undergoing orthodontic and orthognathic correction. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 149 patients aged 13-26 years with moderate or severe craniofacial asymmetry that had a gnathion deviation higher than 2 mm, according to the American Association of Orthodontists. Participants were divided into three groups: teenagers (n = 53), adults (n = 46), and a control group (n = 50) with relative craniofacial asymmetry. Quality of life and psychosocial impacts were evaluated using validated questionnaires that measure health-related quality of life (SF-36), body image satisfaction and self-acceptance (BIQLI), anxiety and depression levels (HADS), and perceived stress (PSS-10). These tools provided an encompassing appraisal of the psychological and social implications associated with craniofacial asymmetry before and six months after orthodontic and orthognathic correction. Before the intervention, adults had higher mental health scores compared to teenagers (p = 0.037). At the 6-month follow-up, no significant differences in mental health scores were observed between the two groups (p = 0.121). BIQLI results showed significant differences in satisfaction with appearance and self-acceptance between teenagers and adults, both before intervention (p = 0.045 and p = 0.051, respectively) and at six months (p = 0.062 and p = 0.031, respectively). HADS results showed significant differences in anxiety levels before intervention (p = 0.039) but not at six months (p = 0.133). PSS-10 results showed no significant differences in perceived stress between the groups. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that craniofacial asymmetry significantly impacts the quality of life and psychosocial well-being of adolescents and young adults. Specifically, teenagers, as compared to young adults, reported lower satisfaction with their appearance and lower self-acceptance before intervention, underscoring the profound psychosocial challenges that adolescents with craniofacial asymmetry may experience. These age-related differences underscore the importance of tailored interventions to address unique psychosocial needs at different developmental stages.

Keywords: facial asymmetry; health-related quality of life; psychological stress; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of SF-36 questionnaire before intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analysis of the BIQLI questionnaire before intervention.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Analysis of the HADS questionnaire before intervention.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Analysis of the PSS-10 questionnaire before intervention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Thiesen G., Gribel B.F., Freitas M.P. Facial asymmetry: A current review. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 2015;20:110–125. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.110-125.sar. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medina-Rivera J.M. Craniofacial Asymmetry: A Literature Review. Int. J. Orthod. 2016;27:63–65. - PubMed
    1. Zamanian N., Jafari-Naeimi A. The Perception of the Severity of Facial Asymmetry among Laypersons, General Practitioners, Orthodontists, and Maxillofacial Surgeons. J. Dent. 2021;22:102–108. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84790.1103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chojdak-Łukasiewicz J., Paradowski B. Facial Asymmetry: A Narrative Review of the Most Common Neurological Causes. Symmetry. 2022;14:737. doi: 10.3390/sym14040737. - DOI
    1. Donkelaar H.J.T., Lammens M., Hori A. Clinical Neuroembryology—Development and Developmental Disorders of the Human Central Nervous System. 1st ed. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2006. pp. 191–228. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources