Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 22;16(13):4532.
doi: 10.3390/ma16134532.

Effect of Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm on Corrosion Kinetics in Titanium Grade 4 Alloys with Different Surface Treatments

Affiliations

Effect of Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm on Corrosion Kinetics in Titanium Grade 4 Alloys with Different Surface Treatments

Jadison Junio Conforte et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

E. faecalis has been associated with bacteremia, sepsis, and bacterial endocarditis and peri-implantitis. This microorganism can remain in the alveolus even after extraction of the root remnant. This study aimed to evaluate the corrosion on different surfaces of commercially pure titanium (Ti) grade 4 (Ticp-G4) as a function of the bacterial biofilm effect of Enterococcus faecalis. A total of 57 discs were randomly divided according to their surface finish (n = 19). For microbiological analysis (n = 9), the discs were placed in 12-well plates containing E. faecalis culture and incubated at 37 °C for 7 days. The results show that for the intergroup analysis, considering the "electrolyte" factor, there was a difference between the groups. There was greater biofilm formation for the D.A.Zir group, with greater electrochemical exchange for Biofilm, and the presence of biofilm favored greater electrochemical exchange with the medium.

Keywords: biofilms; bone-integrated endo-osseous dental implantation; corrosion; titanium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparative graph between D.A., D.A.Zir, and Universal Scanning Interferometry (USI) groups considering the average of CFU/mL × 105, according to ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05; different lowercase letters indicate the statistical difference).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Diagram of the Nyquist values of the surfaces tested are as follows: USI (BHI and Biofilm), D.A. (BHI and Biofilm), and D.A.Zir (BHI and Biofilm).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Graphical representation of the means and standard deviations of the Rp values for the USI, D.A. and D.A.Zir groups in Biofilm and BHI. Equal capital letters show statistical similarity between the surfaces. Equal lowercase letters show statistical similarity with respect to the electrolytes (BHI and Biofilm) between the groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Potentiodynamic curves of the USI, D.A. and D.A.Zir groups as a function of electrolytes (BHI and Biofilm).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Graphical representation of the means and standard deviations of the Icorr values for the groups of surfaces (USI, D.A. and D.A.Zir as a function of electrolytes (BHI and Biofilm)). A single asterisk on the indication of the specimens corresponds to the electrolyte factor. Asterisks over the specimen indication correspond to the surface factor.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Images obtained by MFA in an area of 50 µm by 50 µm on the surface of the Machined (USI), Double Acid Etch (D.A.) and Double Acid Etch and Zirconia Blasting (D.A.Zir) discs. Representing [USI, D.A. and D.A.Zir (Standard)] (disc received by the manufacturer for testing); [USI, D.A. and D.A.Zir (BHI)] (disk that underwent the electrochemical test without biofilm growth for 7 days) and; [USI, D.A. and D.A.Zir (Biofilm)] (disk that underwent the microbiological test for biofilm growth for 7 days followed by the electrochemical test).

Similar articles

References

    1. Hatamleh M.M., Wu X., Alnazzawi A., Watson J., Watts D. Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of cranioplasty titanium implants following different surface treatments. Dent. Mater. 2018;34:676–683. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sarraf M., Rezvani Ghomi E., Alipour S., Ramakrishna S., Liana Sukiman N. A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Biodes. Manuf. 2022;5:371–395. doi: 10.1007/s42242-021-00170-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Szczęsny G., Kopec M., Politis D.J., Kowalewski Z.L., Łazarski A., Szolc T. A Review on Biomaterials for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology: From Past to Present. Materials. 2022;15:3622. doi: 10.3390/ma15103622. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kligman S., Ren Z., Chung C.H., Perillo M.A., Chang Y.C., Koo H., Zheng Z., Li C. The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:1641. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081641. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrini M., Giuliani A., Di Campli E., Di Lodovico S., Iezzi G., Piattelli A., D’Ercole S. The Bacterial Anti-Adhesive Activity of Double-Etched Titanium (DAE) as a Dental Implant Surface. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8315. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218315. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources