Assessing the Novel Myval Balloon-Expandable Valve with the Evolut Valve: A Propensity-Matched Study
- PMID: 37445248
- PMCID: PMC10342455
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134213
Assessing the Novel Myval Balloon-Expandable Valve with the Evolut Valve: A Propensity-Matched Study
Abstract
Background: The Myval balloon-expandable (BE) valve has shown encouraging early clinical data in terms of safety and efficacy. Comparative data with other well-established contemporary valves are nonetheless still scarce. This study aims to compare the performance of the Myval BE valve with the Evolut self-expanding (SE) valve.
Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 223 patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) were included and treated with the Myval BE valve (n = 120) or with the Evolut SE valve (n = 103). Then, 91 pairs were compared after matching. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 30 days and 1 year. Echocardiographic follow-up was performed at 30 days.
Results: Procedural complications were rare in both groups. At the 30-day follow-up, no significant difference in cardiac death (Myval: 1% vs. Evolut: 2%, p = 0.56), stroke (2% vs. 4%, p = 0.41) and myocardial infarction (1% vs. 3%, p = 0.31) was observed. A permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was significantly less needed in the Myval group (4% vs. 15%, p = 0.01). At 1 year, cardiac death (2% vs. 4%, p = 0.41) and the stroke rate (7% vs. 5%, p = 0.76) were similar. Moderate-severe paravalvular leakage (PVL) was also comparable in both groups (1% vs. 4%, p = 0.17).
Conclusion: Safety and efficacy outcomes were comparable between the two valves, except for a higher PPI rate for the Evolut SE valve. Up to 1-year follow-up, clinical outcomes showed acceptable rates of stroke and cardiac death with both valves. Valve hemodynamics were excellent with a low rate of moderate-severe PVL in both groups.
Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; myval valve; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparing two-year outcomes of balloon-expandable Myval and self-expanding Evolut R in severe aortic valve stenosis.Int J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 1;400:131701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131701. Epub 2023 Dec 31. Int J Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38168557
-
Clinical Comparison of a Novel Balloon-Expandable Versus a Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve for the Treatment of Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: The EVAL Registry.J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 12;11(4):959. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040959. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35207232 Free PMC article.
-
Early clinical and haemodynamic matched comparison of balloon-expandable valves.Heart. 2022 May;108(9):725-732. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319349. Epub 2021 Jul 20. Heart. 2022. PMID: 34285104
-
Clinical Outcomes of the Self-Expandable Evolut R Valve Versus the Balloon-Expandable SAPIEN 3 Valve in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Apr;25:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 16. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021. PMID: 33160895
-
Meta-analysis of short- and long-term clinical outcomes of the self-expanding Evolut R/pro valve versus the balloon-expandable Sapien 3 valve for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jan 15;371:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.035. Epub 2022 Sep 18. Int J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36130623
Cited by
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the hemodynamics and outcomes of the Myval balloon-expandable valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis and with aortic regurgitation.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Mar 6;58:101641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101641. eCollection 2025 Jun. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025. PMID: 40130208 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Myval Versus Other Transcatheter Valves in Patients Undergoing TAVI: A Meta-Analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):820-829. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31611. Epub 2025 May 27. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40421696 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single-Center Evaluation of the Myval Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve: A Follow-Up Study: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;8(5):e70808. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70808. eCollection 2025 May. Health Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40421254 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pilgrim T., Lee J.K., O’Sullivan C.J., Stortecky S., Ariotti S., Franzone A., Lanz J., Heg D., Asami M., Praz F., et al. Early versus newer generation devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in routine clinical practice: A propensity score matched analysis. Open Heart. 2018;5:e000695. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000695. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Stundl A., Lucht H., Shamekhi J., Weber M., Sedaghat A., Mellert F., Grube E., Nickenig G., Werner N., Sinning J.M. Early versus newer generation transcatheter heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Echocardiographic and hemodynamic evaluation of an all-comers study cohort using the dimensionless aortic regurgitation index (AR-index) PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0217544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217544. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Yoon S.-H., Lefevre T., Ahn J.-M., Perlman G.Y., Dvir D., Latib A., Barbanti M., Deuschl F., De Backer O., Blanke P., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early-and new-generation devices in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016;68:1195–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.041. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials