Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 26;24(13):10651.
doi: 10.3390/ijms241310651.

The Role of mTORC1 Pathway and Autophagy in Resistance to Platinum-Based Chemotherapeutics

Affiliations
Review

The Role of mTORC1 Pathway and Autophagy in Resistance to Platinum-Based Chemotherapeutics

Zhenrui Pan et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum I) is a platinum-based drug, the mainstay of anticancer treatment for numerous solid tumors. Since its approval by the FDA in 1978, the drug has continued to be used for the treatment of half of epithelial cancers. However, resistance to cisplatin represents a major obstacle during anticancer therapy. Here, we review recent findings on how the mTORC1 pathway and autophagy can influence cisplatin sensitivity and resistance and how these data can be applicable for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: anticancer drug resistance; autophagy; cisplatin; mTORC1 pathway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cancers where cisplatin is used as a mainstream drug.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Main factors of cisplatin resistance. Cancer cells can develop resistance to cisplatin via decreased drug influx or increased efflux, because of the drug inactivation through the interaction with glutathione (GSH) and metallothioneins (MT), because of enhanced DNA damage response and alternations in signaling pathways.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cisplatin and its derivatives used in the treatment of different types of cancers. Side effects for each drug are listed.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overview of mTORC1 signaling.
Figure 5
Figure 5
mTORC1 pathway factors and effectors involved in cisplatin resistance. The factors and effectors of the same signaling path are indicated with the same color. EIF3A translational factor negatively regulates mTORC1 activity. Accordingly, EIF3A downregulation (black arrow) increases mTORC1 activity. The activation of p70S6K by mTORC1 can be suppressed by RAME. Many oncogenic mutations have been detected in eukaryotic translation initiation factors, a group of mTORC1 downstream effectors. In addition, PDCD4, which is not a direct target of mTORC1, can suppress protein translation by interacting with EIF4A and EIF4G to inhibit the formation of the translation initiation complex. A knockdown of PDCD4 (black arrow) reduces sensitivity to platinum drugs. BCAT1 overexpression results in a decrease of leucine and other branched-chain amino acid levels. As a consequence, mTORC1 cannot be effectively activated (dashed arrow), resulting in enhanced autophagy and cisplatin resistance. NPRL2 downregulation (white arrow) results in mTORC1 activation, compromised DNA damage response and cisplatin resistance. See text for more details. RAGD promotes TFEB inhibition through its phosphorylation by mTORC1 and sequestration in the cytoplasm, where TFEB cannot exert its function as a transcription factor. Cisplatin treatment induces TFEB nuclear translocation and activation. Active TFEB increases the expression of programmed cell death-ligands 1 and 2 (PD-L1 and PD-L2) to foster an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that mediates drug resistance. The suppression of TFEB inhibits the expression of the copper transporter ATP7B involved in cisplatin efflux and sensitizes initially resistant ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Main factors of autophagy involved in cisplatin resistance. HQ/CQ: chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howell S.B., Safaei R., Larson C.A., Sailor M.J. Copper Transporters and the Cellular Pharmacology of the Platinum-Containing Cancer Drugs. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010;77:887–894. doi: 10.1124/mol.109.063172. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Planells-Cases R., Lutter D., Guyader C., Gerhards N.M., Ullrich F., Elger D.A., Kucukosmanoglu A., Xu G., Voss F.K., Reincke S.M., et al. Subunit Composition of VRAC Channels Determines Substrate Specificity and Cellular Resistance to P T-based Anti-cancer Drugs. EMBO J. 2015;34:2993–3008. doi: 10.15252/embj.201592409. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lukanović D., Herzog M., Kobal B., Černe K. The Contribution of Copper Efflux Transporters ATP7A and ATP7B to Chemoresistance and Personalized Medicine in Ovarian Cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;129:110401. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petruzzelli R., Polishchuk R.S. Activity and Trafficking of Copper-Transporting ATPases in Tumor Development and Defense against Platinum-Based Drugs. Cells. 2019;8:1080. doi: 10.3390/cells8091080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jamieson E.R., Lippard S.J. Structure, Recognition, and Processing of Cisplatin−DNA Adducts. Chem. Rev. 1999;99:2467–2498. doi: 10.1021/cr980421n. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms