Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 27;24(13):10697.
doi: 10.3390/ijms241310697.

Contact Dermatitis to Diabetes Medical Devices

Affiliations
Review

Contact Dermatitis to Diabetes Medical Devices

Mikołaj Cichoń et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Skin adverse reactions to diabetes medical devices have been reported frequently over recent years. Adhesives attaching glucose sensors and continuous insulin infusion sets to the skin are proven to cause both allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis in patients with diabetes mellitus. Several allergens contained in adhesives and/or parts of medical devices are documented to cause allergic contact dermatitis, with acrylate chemicals being the most common culprit-especially isobornyl acrylate (IBOA), but also 2,2'-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate or cyanoacrylates. Epoxy resin, colophonium and nickel were also identified as causative allergens. However, repetitive occlusion, maceration of the skin and resulting disruption of the skin barrier seem to have an impact on the development of skin lesions as well. The purpose of this study is to highlight the burden of contact dermatitis triggered by diabetes medical devices and to show possible mechanisms responsible for the development of contact dermatitis in a group of diabetic patients.

Keywords: 2,2′-methylenebis(6-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol) monoacrylate; IBOA; MBPA; allergic contact dermatitis; diabetes medical devices; glucose sensors; insulin pumps; irritant contact dermatitis; isobornyl acrylate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Factors contributing to the development of contact dermatitis from diabetes medical devices.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bailey T., Bode B.W., Christiansen M.P., Klaff L.J., Alva S. The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2015;17:787–794. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0378. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Shaikh A., Al Zahrani A.M., Qari Y.H., AbuAlnasr A.A., Alhawsawi W.K., Alshehri K.A., AlShaikh S.A. Quality of Life in Children with Diabetes Treated with Insulin Pump Compared with Multiple Daily Injections in Tertiary Care Center. Clin. Med. Insights Endocrinol. Diabetes. 2020;13:117955142095907. doi: 10.1177/1179551420959077. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellou V., Belbasis L., Tzoulaki I., Evangelou E. Risk Factors for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Exposure-Wide Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194127. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herman A., de Montjoye L., Tromme I., Goossens A., Baeck M. Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Medical Devices for Diabetes Patients: A Review. Contact Dermat. 2018;79:331–335. doi: 10.1111/cod.13120. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jick S.S., Oleske D.M., Persson R., Zamudio J., Facheris M.F. Epidemiology of Skin Event Rates among Users of Pumps for the Subcutaneous Administration of Drugs for Chronic Conditions. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2021;37:1563–1571. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1953971. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms