Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 29;28(13):5119.
doi: 10.3390/molecules28135119.

Response Methodology Optimization and Artificial Neural Network Modeling for the Removal of Sulfamethoxazole Using an Ozone-Electrocoagulation Hybrid Process

Affiliations

Response Methodology Optimization and Artificial Neural Network Modeling for the Removal of Sulfamethoxazole Using an Ozone-Electrocoagulation Hybrid Process

Nguyen Trong Nghia et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Removing antibiotics from water is critical to prevent the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance, protect ecosystems, and maintain the effectiveness of these vital medications. The combination of ozone and electrocoagulation in wastewater treatment provides enhanced removal of contaminants, improved disinfection efficiency, and increased overall treatment effectiveness. In this work, the removal of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) from an aqueous solution using an ozone-electrocoagulation (O-EC) system was optimized and modeled. The experiments were designed according to the central composite design. The parameters, including current density, reaction time, pH, and ozone dose affecting the SMX removal efficiency of the OEC system, were optimized using a response surface methodology. The results show that the removal process was accurately predicted by the quadric model. The numerical optimization results show that the optimum conditions were a current density of 33.2 A/m2, a time of 37.8 min, pH of 8.4, and an ozone dose of 0.7 g/h. Under these conditions, the removal efficiency reached 99.65%. A three-layer artificial neural network (ANN) with logsig-purelin transfer functions was used to model the removal process. The data predicted by the ANN model matched well to the experimental data. The calculation of the relative importance showed that pH was the most influential factor, followed by current density, ozone dose, and time. The kinetics of the SMX removal process followed the first-order kinetic model with a rate constant of 0.12 (min-1). The removal mechanism involves various processes such as oxidation and reduction on the surface of electrodes, the reaction between ozone and ferrous ions, degradation of SMX molecules, formation of flocs, and adsorption of species on the flocs. The results obtained in this work indicate that the O-EC system is a potential approach for the removal of antibiotics from water.

Keywords: electrocoagulation; optimization; ozone; removal efficiency; sulfamethoxazole.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Normal plot of residuals (a), residual versus predicted plot (b), Box−Cox plot for power transform (c), and plot of predicted versus actual values of the removal efficiency (d).
Figure 2
Figure 2
3D plots presenting effects of factors on the SMX removal efficiency: (a) pH and current density; (b) time and current density; (c) ozone dose and current density; (d) time and pH; (e) ozone dose and pH; (f) ozone dose and time.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ANN structure used for modeling the SMX removal process by O-E system.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The final regression values of the ANN structure with logsig and purelin transfer function for trained, validated, tested, and whole network performance.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The relative importance of the variables calculated from the ANN.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The first-order kinetic model for removal of SMX by O–EC system.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Possible mechanism for the removal of SMX by the O−EC system.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic of O–EC system used for SMX removal.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prasannamedha G., Kumar P.S. A Review on Contamination and Removal of Sulfamethoxazole from Aqueous Solution Using Cleaner Techniques: Present and Future Perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;250:119553. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119553. - DOI
    1. Gao S., Zhao Z., Xu Y., Tian J., Qi H., Lin W., Cui F. Oxidation of Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) by Chlorine, Ozone and Permanganate-A Comparative Study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014;274:258–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ma S., Zuo X., Xiong J., Ma C., Chen Z. Sulfamethoxazole Removal Enhancement from Water in High-Silica ZSM-5/Ozonation Synchronous System with Low Ozone Consumption. J. Water Process Eng. 2020;33:101083. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101083. - DOI
    1. Mestre A.S., Carvalho A.P. Photocatalytic Degradation of Pharmaceuticals Wastewater. Molecules. 2019;24:3702. doi: 10.3390/molecules24203702. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bizi M. Sulfamethoxazole Removal from Drinking Water by Activated Carbon: Kinetics and Diffusion Process. Molecules. 2020;25:4656. doi: 10.3390/molecules25204656. - DOI - PMC - PubMed