Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 7;28(13):5268.
doi: 10.3390/molecules28135268.

Experimental and Theoretical Estimations of Atrazine's Adsorption in Mangosteen-Peel-Derived Nanoporous Carbons

Affiliations

Experimental and Theoretical Estimations of Atrazine's Adsorption in Mangosteen-Peel-Derived Nanoporous Carbons

Juan Matos et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Nanoporous carbons were prepared via chemical and physical activation from mangosteen-peel-derived chars. The removal of atrazine was studied due to the bifunctionality of the N groups. Pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intraparticle pore diffusion kinetic models were analyzed. Adsorption isotherms were also analyzed according to the Langmuir and Freundlich models. The obtained results were compared against two commercially activated carbons with comparable surface chemistry and porosimetry. The highest uptake was found for carbons with higher content of basic surface groups. The role of the oxygen-containing groups in the removal of atrazine was estimated experimentally using the surface density. The results were compared with the adsorption energy of atrazine theoretically estimated on pristine and functionalized graphene with different oxygen groups using periodic DFT methods. The energy of adsorption followed the same trend observed experimentally, namely the more basic the pH, the more favored the adsorption of atrazine. Micropores played an important role in the uptake of atrazine at low concentrations, but the presence of mesoporous was also required to inhibit the pore mass diffusion limitations. The present work contributes to the understanding of the interactions between triazine-based pollutants and the surface functional groups on nanoporous carbons in the liquid-solid interface.

Keywords: DFT estimations; atrazine removal; isotherms; kinetics; nanoporous carbons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at −196 °C; (b) pore size distributions. The figure inset shows the cumulative pore volume on the activated carbons.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SEM images of the homemade carbons: (a) MPB-CO2; (b) MPB-P50.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evolution of pH of activated carbons as a function of contact time.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kinetics of atrazine adsorption (qt) as a function of the initial concentration: (a) ACM; (b) ACPC; (c) MPB-CO2; (d) MPB-P50.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Adsorption isotherms of atrazine: (a) ACM; (b) ACPC; (c) MPB-CO2; (d) MPB-P50.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Optimized geometries of adsorbed systems in 1/1 monolayer using one atrazine molecule on a 5 × 5 graphene surface unit cell. O, N, Cl, and H atoms correspond to red, blue, green, and grey spheres, respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
DOS (black line) and projected DOS on the pristine GPristine graphene (green line) and atrazine (blue line) with the PBE functional.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic model for the atrazine adsorption on porous carbons: (a) low ATZ concentration. (b) high ATZ concentration.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ratnayaka D.D., Brandt M.J., Johnson K.M. Specialized and advanced water treatment processes. In: Ratnayaka D., Brandt M.J., Johnson K.M., editors. Water Supply. 6th ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2009. pp. 365–423.
    1. Crittenden J.C., Trussell R.R., Hand D.W., Howe K.J., Tchobanoglous G. MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design. John and Wiley and Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2012. Granular filtration; pp. 727–818.
    1. Sauvé S., Desrosiers M. A review of what is an emerging contaminant. Chem. Cent. J. 2014;8:15. doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-15. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ternes T.A., Meisenheimer M., McDowell D., Sacher F., Brauch H.-J., Haistgulde B., Zulei-Seibert N. Removal of pharmaceuticals during drinking water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002;36:3855–3863. doi: 10.1021/es015757k. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loraine G.A., Pettigrove M.E. Seasonal variations in concentrations of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in drinking water and reclaimed wastewater in southern California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:687–695. doi: 10.1021/es051380x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources