Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 28:14:1202971.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1202971. eCollection 2023.

Association of CSF and PET markers of neurodegeneration with electroclinical progression in Lafora disease

Affiliations

Association of CSF and PET markers of neurodegeneration with electroclinical progression in Lafora disease

Giuseppe d'Orsi et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the electro-clinical features in association with laboratory and instrumental correlates of neurodegeneration to detect the progression of Lafora disease (LD).

Methods: We investigated the electro-clinical longitudinal data and CSF Aβ42, p-tau181 and t-tauAg, amyloid, and 18F-FDG PET of five unrelated LD families.

Results: Three progressive electro-clinical stages were identified. The early phase was characterized by rare, generalized tonic-clonic and focal visual seizures, followed by the occurrence of myoclonus after a period ranging from 2 to 12 months. The intermediate stage, usually occurring 2 years after the onset of epilepsy, is characterized by a worsening of epilepsy and myoclonus associated with progressive dementia and cerebellar signs. Finally, the late stage, evolving after a mean period of 7 ± 1.41 years from the onset of the disease, was characterized by gait ataxia resulting in bedriddenness, severe dementia, daily/pluri-daily myoclonus, drug-resistant epilepsy, clusters of seizures or status epilepticus, and medical complications. Amyloid (CSF Aβ42, amyloid PET) and neurodegenerative (CSF p-tau181 and t-tauAg, FDG-PET) biomarkers indicate a pattern of cognitive impairment of the non-Alzheimer's disease type. A total of 80% of the LD patients showed more severe hypometabolism in the second FDG-PET scan compared to the first scan performed in a lower phase; the lateral temporal lobe and the thalamus hypometabolism were associated with the presence of intermediate or late phase.

Conclusions: Three electroclinical and 18F-FDG PET evolutive stages are useful biomarkers for the progression of LD and could help to evaluate the efficacy of new disease-modifying treatments. The combination of traditional CSF biomarkers improves the diagnostic accuracy of cognitive decline in LD patients, indicating a cognitive impairment of the non-Alzheimer's disease type.

Keywords: 18F-FDG PET; Lafora disease; amyloid biomarkers; electro-clinical features; follow-up; neurodegenerative biomarkers; progressive myoclonic epilepsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The electroclinical phases of LD patients. Four main and progressive symptoms (epilepsy, myoclonus, ataxia, and dementia) are included in three evolutive electroclinical stages [green line: Phase 1 (early stage); orange line: Phase 2 (intermediate stage); red line: Phase 3 (late stage)].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Aβ42, p-tau181, t-tauAg values, and IATI, and graphics of Aβ42, p-tau181, and t-tauAg visualization, and combination. According to the IATI index, the patients analyzed at the early stage showed a normal cognitive pattern profile (p-tau181 < 60 pg/ml and IATI > 1.2), while the patients at the intermediate and late stages showed a pattern of non-Alzheimer dementia (ptau181 < 60 pg/ml and IATI < 1.2).
Figure 3
Figure 3
SPM patient 1 longitudinal analysis (p = 0.05 cluster-level above 100 voxels). SPM-t maps showed FDG hypometabolism in Phase 2 (A) and Phase 3 after 18 months (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
SPM patient 1 in Phase 2 of the disease (p = 0.05 cluster-level above 100 voxels). SPM-t maps show bilateral FDG hypometabolism within the thalamus and the temporal and frontal lobes.

References

    1. Turnbull J, Tiberia E, Striano P, Genton P, Carpenter S, Ackerley CA, et al. . Lafora disease. Epileptic Disord. (2016) 18:S38–62. 10.1684/epd.2016.0842 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nitschke F, Ahonen S, Nitscke S, Mitra S, Minassian B. Lafora disease - from pathogenesis to treatment strategies. Nat Rev Neurol. (2018) 14:606–61. 10.1038/s41582-018-0057-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. d'Orsi G, Lalla A, Palumbo O, Di Claudio MT, Valenzano A, Sabetta A, et al. . The presenting symptoms of Lafora disease: an electroclinical and genetic study in five Apulian (Southern Italy) families. Seizure. (2020) 83:145–53. 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.10.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pondrelli F, Muccioli L, Licchetta L, Mostacci B, Zenesini C, Tinuper P, et al. . Natural history of Lafora disease: a prognostic systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. (2021) 16:362. 10.1186/s13023-021-01989-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. d'Orsi G Di Claudio MT Palumbo O and Carella M . Electro-clinical features and management of the late stage of Lafora disease. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:969297. 10.3389/fneur.2022.969297 - DOI - PMC - PubMed