Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 7;4(7):e231921.
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1921.

Spending on Phased Clinical Development of Approved Drugs by the US National Institutes of Health Compared With Industry

Affiliations

Spending on Phased Clinical Development of Approved Drugs by the US National Institutes of Health Compared With Industry

Edward W Zhou et al. JAMA Health Forum. .

Abstract

Importance: The launch of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health to advance new cures and address public concern regarding drug prices has raised questions about the roles of government and industry in drug development.

Objectives: To compare National Institutes of Health (NIH) spending on phased clinical development of approved drugs with that by industry.

Design: This cross-sectional study examined NIH funding for published research reporting the results of phased clinical trials of drugs approved between 2010 and 2019 and compared the findings with reported industry spending estimates. Data analysis was performed between May 2021 and August 2022 using PubMed data from January 1999 through October 2021 and NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results data from January 1999 through December 2020.

Exposures: Drugs approved between 2010 and 2019.

Main outcome and measures: National Institutes of Health funding for published research describing applied research on approved drugs, basic research on their biological targets, and phased clinical trials related to drugs approved between 2010 and 2019 were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U tests. All costs were inflation adjusted to 2018.

Results: National Institutes of Health funding for basic or applied research related to 386 of 387 drugs approved between 2010 and 2019 totaled $247.3 billion. Of this amount, $8.1 billion (3.3%) was related to phased clinical development. This funding contributed to 12 340 publications on phased clinical trial results involving 240 of 387 (62.0%) drugs. Average NIH spending was $33.8 million per drug, including $13.9 million per drug for phase 1, $22.2 million per drug for phase 2, and $12.9 million per drug for phase 3 trials. Spending by NIH on phased development represented 9.8% to 10.7% of estimated industry spending, including 24.6% to 25.3% of estimated phase 1, 21.4% to 23.2% of phase 2, and 3.7% to 4.3% of phase 3 costs. Considering 60 products for which estimated industry costs were publicly available, NIH spending on clinical trials was significantly lower than estimated industry spending (sum of averages, $54.9 million per drug; mean difference, $326.0 million; 95% CI, $235.6-$416.4 million; 2-tailed paired t test P < .001). More than 90% of NIH funding came through cooperative agreements or program projects and centers, while 3.3% of NIH funding came through investigator-initiated research projects.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study, NIH funding for phased clinical development of drugs approved between 2010 and 2019 represented a small fraction of NIH spending on pharmaceutical innovation. This spending focused primarily on early-phase clinical trials and research capacity and was significantly less than estimated industry spending on clinical development. These results may inform the efficient allocation of government funding to advance pharmaceutical innovation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Jackson and Ledley reported receiving grants to Bentley University from the Institute for New Economic Thinking and West Health Policy Center outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Schematic of National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding for Basic or Applied Research and Phased Clinical Trials of Drugs Approved, 2010-2019
This analysis identified PubMed Indexing Numbers (PMIDs) related to 387 drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 2010 and 2019. National Institutes of Health project years and total costs are shown here for basic research on the drug’s biological targets, applied research on the drug as a known molecule, nonphase human clinical trials, and phased clinical trials representing development research. Percentages given are of total NIH investment for all drugs.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Categories of National Institutes of Health (NIH)-Funded Projects Contributing to Phased Clinical Development of Drugs Approved, 2010-2019
Projects are categorized by activity code. aIncludes research career programs, training programs, institutional training, and fellowship programs. bIncludes general clinical research centers funded prior to 2005.

Comment in

  • doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1309

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collins FS, Schwetz TA, Tabak LA, Lander ES. ARPA-H: Accelerating biomedical breakthroughs. Science. 2021;373(6551):165-167. doi:10.1126/science.abj8547 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Remarks by President Biden in address to a joint session of Congress. The White House ; April 28, 2021. Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/04/29/rem...
    1. Comroe JH Jr, Dripps RD. Scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. Science. 1976;192(4235):105-111. doi:10.1126/science.769161 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toole AA. The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Res Policy. 2012;41(1):1-12. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.004 - DOI
    1. Galkina Cleary E, Beierlein JM, Khanuja NS, McNamee LM, Ledley FD. Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010-2016. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(10):2329-2334. doi:10.1073/pnas.1715368115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances