Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;165(9):2365-2375.
doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05715-2. Epub 2023 Jul 15.

Hinge craniotomy versus standard decompressive hemicraniectomy: an experimental preclinical comparative study

Affiliations

Hinge craniotomy versus standard decompressive hemicraniectomy: an experimental preclinical comparative study

Antonio Biroli et al. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the most common surgical procedure to manage increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Hinge craniotomy (HC), which consists of fixing the bone operculum with a pivot, is an alternative method conceived to avoid some DC-related complications; nonetheless, it is debated whether it can provide enough volume expansion. In this study, we aimed to analyze the volume and ICP obtained with HC using an experimental cadaver-based preclinical model and compare the results to baseline and DC.

Methods: Baseline conditions, HC, and DC were compared on both sides of five anatomical specimens. Volume and ICP values were measured with a custom-made system. Local polynomial regression was used to investigate volume differences.

Results: The area of the bone opercula resulting from measurements was 115.55 cm2; the mean supratentorial volume was 955 mL. HC led to intermediate results compared to baseline and DC. At an ICP of 50 mmHg, HC offers 130 mL extra space but 172 mL less than a DC. Based on local polynomial regression, the mean volume difference between HC and the standard craniotomy was 10%; 14% between DC and HC; both are higher than the volume of brain herniation reported in the literature in the clinical setting. The volume leading to an ICP of 50 mmHg at baseline was less than the volume needed to reach an ICP of 20 mmHg after HC (10.05% and 14.95% from baseline, respectively).

Conclusions: These data confirm the efficacy of HC in providing sufficient volume expansion. HC is a valid intermediate alternative in case of potentially evolutionary lesions and non-massive edema, especially in developing countries.

Keywords: Decompressive craniectomy; Hinge craniotomy; Intracranial pressure; Severe TBI.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM (2006) Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. JNS 104(4):469–479 - DOI
    1. Abdullah JY, Rajion ZA, Martin AG, Jaafar A, Ghani ARI, Abdullah JM (2019) Shape-based interpolation method in measuring intracranial volume for pre- and post-operative decompressive craniectomy using open source software. Neurocirugía 30(3):115–123 - DOI
    1. Adeleye A (2016) Clinical and radiologic outcome of a less invasive, low-cost surgical technique of osteoplastic decompressive craniectomy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 77(02):167–175 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Ahn D-H, Kim D-W, Kang S-D (2009) In situ floating resin cranioplasty for cerebral decompression. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46(4):417 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Ao A, Al A (2011) Decompressive craniectomy bone flap hinged on the temporalis muscle: a new inexpensive use for an old neurosurgical technique. Surg Neurol Int 2(1):150 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources