Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;27(11):1125-1130.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02827-w. Epub 2023 Jul 15.

Robotic abdominoperineal resection, posterior vaginectomy and abdomino-lithotomy sacrectomy: technical considerations and case vignette

Affiliations

Robotic abdominoperineal resection, posterior vaginectomy and abdomino-lithotomy sacrectomy: technical considerations and case vignette

C C Kearsey et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

When working with patients who have locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) the ability to undertake minimally invasive procedures becomes more challenging but no less important for patient outcomes. We performed a minimally invasive approach to surgery for LARC invading the posterior vagina and sacrum. The patient was a 75-year-old lady who presented with a locally advanced rectal tumour staged T4N2 with invasion into the posterior wall of the vagina and coccyx/distal sacrum. We introduce a robotic abdominoperineal resection, posterior vaginectomy and abdomino-lithotomy sacrectomy using a purely perineal approach with no robotic adjuncts or intracorporal techniques. Final histology showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma invading the vagina and sacrum, ypT4b N0 TRG2 R0 and the patient entered surgical follow-up with no immediate intra- or postoperative complications. A literature review shows the need for more minimally invasive techniques when relating to major pelvic surgery and the benefits of a purely perineal approach include less expensive resource use, fewer training requirements and the ability to utilise this technique in centres that are not robotically equipped.

Keywords: Pelvic exenteration; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
T2 weighted axial (left) and sagittal (right) sections of the MRI that clearly show the rectal tumour involving S5 and posterior vagina.  Figure 2 Diagrammatic representation of port placement
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagrammatic sagittal section showing the everted rectum delivered through the perineal wound with the tumour dissected from the posterior vagina and pelvic side
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Diagrammatic view of Fig. 2 from the perineal viewpoint with the osteotome in position

References

    1. Kawada K, Okada T, Masui K, et al. Robotic supralevator total pelvic exenteration with lateral pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2022;26(9):761–762. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02625-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butcher HR, Spjut HJ. An evaluation of pelvic exenteration for advanced carcinoma of the lower colon. Cancer. 1959;12:681–687. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195907/08)12:4<681::AID-CNCR2820120409>3.0.CO;2-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pawlik TM, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Pelvic exenteration for advanced pelvic malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:612–623. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.082. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams M, Perera M, Nouhaud F-X, Coughlin G. Robotic pelvic exenteration and extended pelvic resections for locally advanced or synchronous rectal and urological malignancy. Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62:111–120. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200176. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solum AM, Riffenburgh RH, Johnstone PA. Survival of patients with untreated rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2004;87:157–161. doi: 10.1002/jso.20104. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources