The failure to rescue factor: aftermath analyses on 224 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
- PMID: 37452927
- DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01589-2
The failure to rescue factor: aftermath analyses on 224 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
Abstract
The term "failure to rescue" (FTR) has been recently introduced in the field of hepato-biliary surgery to label cases in which major postoperative complications lead to postoperative fatality. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) surgery has consistently high postoperative morbidity and mortality rates in which factors associated with FTR are yet to be discovered. The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the Rescue with the FTR cohort referencing patients' characteristics and management protocols applied. A cohort of 224 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for PHC, between 2010 and 2021, was enrolled. Perioperative variables were analyzed according to the severity of major postoperative complications (Clavien ≥ 3a). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to determine complications' impact on survival. Major complications were reported in 86 cases (38%). Among the major complications' cohort, 72 cases (84%) were graded Clavien 3a-4 (Rescue group), while 14 (16%) cases were graded Clavien 5 (FTR group). Number of lymph-node metastases (OR = 1.33 (1.08-1.63) p = 0.006), poorly differentiated (G3) adenocarcinoma (OR = 7.55 (1.24-45.8) p = 0.028, reintervention (OR = 16.47 (2.76-98.08) p = 0.002), and prognostic nutritional index < 40 (OR = 3.01 (2.265-3.654) p < 0.001) rates were independent predictors of FTR. Right resection side (OR 2.4 (1.33-4.34) p = 0.004) increased the odds of major complications but not of FTR. No difference in overall survival was identified. A distinction of perioperative factors associated with postoperative complications' severity is crucial. Patients developing severe outcomes seem to have different biological and nutritional profiles, showing that efficient preoperative protocols are strategic to identify and avert the risk of FTR.
Keywords: Failure to Rescue; Liver Surgery; Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma; Surgical Outcomes; Survival.
© 2023. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
References
-
- Lee SG, Song GW, Hwang S, Ha TY, Moon DB, Jung DH, Kim KH, Ahn CS, Kim MH, Lee SK, Sung KB, Ko GY (2010) Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(4):476–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0204-5 . (Epub 2009 Oct 23; PMID: 19851704) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N, Wex C, Lobeck H, Hintze R (1999) Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 230(6):808–818. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199912000-00010 . (discussion 819. PMID: 10615936; PMCID: PMC1420945) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Mansour JC, Aloia TA, Crane CH, Heimbach JK, Nagino M, Vauthey JN (2015) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford) 17(8):691–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12450.PMID:26172136;PMCID:PMC4527854 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E, Shichinohe T, Tsuchikawa T, Kato K, Matsumoto J, Kawasaki R (2010) Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a special reference to postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(4):455–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0208-1 . (Epub 2009 Oct 8; PMID: 19820891) - DOI - PubMed
-
- van Keulen AM, Olthof PB, Cescon M, Guglielmi A, Jarnagin WR, Nadalin S, Pratschke J, Ratti F, Troisi RI, Groot Koerkamp B, Buettner S, Erdmann JI, On Behalf of the Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Collaboration Group (2021) Actual 10-year survival after resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: what factors preclude a chance for cure? Cancers (Basel). 13(24):6260. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246260 . (PMID: 34944880; PMCID: PMC8699376) - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
