Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 30:17:1208581.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1208581. eCollection 2023.

Transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates auditory-motor integration for vocal pitch regulation

Affiliations

Transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates auditory-motor integration for vocal pitch regulation

Yichen Chang et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background: A growing body of literature has implicated the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in the online monitoring of vocal production through auditory feedback. Specifically, disruption of or damage to the left DLPFC leads to exaggerated compensatory vocal responses to altered auditory feedback. It is conceivable that enhancing the cortical excitability of the left DLPFC may produce inhibitory influences on vocal feedback control by reducing vocal compensations.

Methods: We used anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) to modulate cortical excitability of the left DLPFC and examined its effects on auditory-motor integration for vocal pitch regulation. Seventeen healthy young adults vocalized vowel sounds while hearing their voice pseudo-randomly pitch-shifted by ±50 or ±200 cents, either during (online) or after (offline) receiving active or sham a-tDCS over the left DLPFC.

Results: Active a-tDCS over the left DLPFC led to significantly smaller peak magnitudes and shorter peak times of vocal compensations for pitch perturbations than sham stimulation. In addition, this effect was consistent regardless of the timing of a-tDCS (online or offline stimulation) and the size and direction of the pitch perturbation.

Conclusion: These findings provide the first causal evidence that a-tDCS over the left DLPFC can facilitate auditory-motor integration for compensatory adjustment to errors in vocal output. Reduced and accelerated vocal compensations caused by a-tDCS over left DLPFC support the hypothesis of a top-down neural mechanism that exerts inhibitory control over vocal motor behavior through auditory feedback.

Keywords: auditory feedback; left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; speech motor control; top–down modulation; transcranial direct current stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Grand-averaged voice fo responses to pitch perturbations of ±50 cents (left panel) and ±200 cents (right panel) when active (red solid lines) or sham (blue solid lines) a-tDCS over the left DLPFC was applied during the FAF task. Highlighted areas represent the standard errors of the mean vocal responses, while the vertical dash lines indicate the onset of pitch perturbations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Violin plots illustrating the magnitudes (A,B) and latencies (C,D) of vocal responses to pitch perturbations of ±50 cents and ±200 cents when active (red) and sham (blue) a-tDCS over the left DLPFC was applied during the FAF task. The shape of the violin shows the kernel density estimate of the data. The white dots and box plots represent the medians and ranges from first to third quartiles of the data sets. The red and blue dots represent the individual vocal responses for active and sham a-tDCS over the left DLPFC. The asterisks indicate significant differences across the conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Grand-averaged voice fo contours in response to pitch perturbations of ±50 cents (left panel) and ±200 cents (right panel) when active (red solid lines) or sham (blue solid lines) a-tDCS was applied over the left DLPFC prior to the FAF task. Highlighted areas represent the standard errors of the mean vocal responses, while the vertical dash lines indicate the onset of pitch perturbations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Violin plots illustrating the magnitudes (A,B) and latencies (C,D) of vocal responses to pitch perturbations of ±50 cents and ±200 cents when active (red) or sham (blue) a-tDCS was applied over the left DLPFC prior to the FAF task. The white dots and box plots represent the medians and ranges from first to third quartiles of the data sets. The red and blue dots represent the individual vocal responses for active and sham a-tDCS over the left DLPFC. The asterisks indicate significant differences across the conditions.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Violin plots illustrating the magnitudes (A) and latencies (B) of vocal responses to pitch perturbations when active or sham a-tDCS was applied over the left DLPFC prior to (offline) or during (online) the FAF task. The white dots and box plots represent the medians and ranges from first to third quartiles of the data sets. The red and blue dots represent the individual vocal responses for online and offline a-tDCS over the left DLPFC. The asterisks indicate significant differences across the conditions.

References

    1. Angius L., Santarnecchi E., Pascual-Leone A., Marcora S. M. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves inhibitory control and endurance performance in healthy individuals. Neuroscience 419, 34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.052, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bauer J. J., Mittal J., Larson C. R., Hain T. C. (2006). Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 2363–2371. doi: 10.1121/1.2173513, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behroozmand R., Johari K., Bridwell K., Hayden C., Fahey D., den Ouden D. B. (2020). Modulation of vocal pitch control through high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the left ventral motor cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 238, 1525–1535. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05832-9, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Behroozmand R., Phillip L., Johari K., Bonilha L., Rorden C., Hickok G., et al. . (2018). Sensorimotor impairment of speech auditory feedback processing in aphasia. NeuroImage 165, 102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.014, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behroozmand R., Shebek R., Hansen D. R., Oya H., Robin D. A., Howard M. A., 3rd, et al. . (2015). Sensory-motor networks involved in speech production and motor control: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 109, 418–428. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.040, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources