Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 29:11:1077953.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1077953. eCollection 2023.

Do social media interventions increase vaccine uptake?

Affiliations

Do social media interventions increase vaccine uptake?

Francesca Maria Grosso et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The Italian mass COVID-19 vaccination campaign has included children aged 5-11 years as part of the target population since December 2021. One of the biggest challenges to vaccine uptake was vaccine hesitancy among parents and children's caregivers. Primary care pediatricians (PCPs), as the first point of contact between the National Health Service (NHS) and parents/caretakers, initiated various communication strategies to tackle this hesitancy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a PCP-led social media intervention and a digital reminder service (DRS) on parental hesitancy regarding vaccinating their 5-11-year-old children against COVID-19.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was designed, and the chosen target populations were parents and caretakers of children aged 5-11 years. Two PCP cohorts were recruited. The first group received a social media intervention and a DRS; while the second group did not. Both cohorts had access to traditional face-to-face and telephone-based counseling. The vaccination coverage rate in the two groups was evaluated.

Results: A total of 600 children were enrolled. The exposed cohort (277 patients) received social media intervention, DRS, and counseling options (face-to-face and telephone-based), whereas the non-exposed cohort (323 patients) received only counseling options. In total, 89 patients from the exposed cohort did not receive any dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (32.5%), 165 were fully immunized (59.5%), and 23 received only one dose (8.5%). A total of 150 non-exposed patients did not receive any dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (47%), 147 were fully immunized (45.5%), and 24 only received one dose (7.4%). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (chi square = 11.5016; p = 0.0006).

Conclusion: Social media and DRS interventions had a positive impact on vaccine uptake and may be helpful in tackling vaccine hesitancy. Better-designed studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Keywords: COVID-19; primary care setting; social media; vaccine campaign; vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportions of fully immunized, partly immunized, and non-immunized children compared between the two cohorts (The pink color represents the exposed group, and the blue color represents the unexposed).

References

    1. Zarbo C, Candini V, Ferrari C, d'Addazio M, Calamandrei G, Starace F, et al. . COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Italy: predictors of acceptance, fence sitting and refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:873098. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.873098 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noni E. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope, and determinants. Vaccine. (2015) 33:4161–4. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pierantoni L, Lenzi J, Lanari M, De Rose C, Morello R, Di Mauro A, et al. . A nationwide COVID- 19 survey of Italian parents reveals useful information on attitudes to school attendance, medical support, vaccines and drug trials. Acta Paediatr. (2021) 110:942–3. 10.1111/apa.15614 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rifkin SB. Alma ata after 40 years: primary health care and health for all – from consensus to complexity. BMJ Glob Health. (2018) 3(Suppl. 3):e001188. 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-00118 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kontopantelis E, Springate AD, Ashworth M, Webb RT, Buchan IE, Doran T. Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study. BMJ. (2015) 350:h904. 10.1136/bmj.h904 - DOI - PMC - PubMed