Prophylactic Administration of Vasopressors Prior to Emergency Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Clinical Trials
- PMID: 37457916
- PMCID: PMC10344527
- DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000946
Prophylactic Administration of Vasopressors Prior to Emergency Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Analysis of Two Multicenter Clinical Trials
Abstract
Hypotension affects approximately 40% of critically ill patients undergoing emergency intubation and is associated with an increased risk of death. The objective of this study was to examine the association between prophylactic vasopressor administration and the incidence of peri-intubation hypotension and other clinical outcomes.
Design: A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized clinical trials. The clinical effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration was estimated using a one-to-one propensity-matched cohort of patients with and without prophylactic vasopressors.
Setting: Seven emergency departments and 17 ICUs across the United States.
Patients: One thousand seven hundred ninety-eight critically ill patients who underwent emergency intubation at the study sites between February 1, 2019, and May 24, 2021.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was peri-intubation hypotension defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg occurring between induction and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation. A total of 187 patients (10%) received prophylactic vasopressors prior to intubation. Compared with patients who did not receive prophylactic vasopressors, those who did were older, had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, were more likely to have a diagnosis of sepsis, had lower pre-induction systolic blood pressures, and were more likely to be on continuous vasopressor infusions prior to intubation. In our propensity-matched cohort, prophylactic vasopressor administration was not associated with reduced risk of peri-intubation hypotension (41% vs 32%; p = 0.08) or change in systolic blood pressure from baseline (-12 vs -11 mm Hg; p = 0.66).
Conclusions: The administration of prophylactic vasopressors was not associated with a lower incidence of peri-intubation hypotension in our propensity-matched analysis. To address potential residual confounding, randomized clinical trials should examine the effect of prophylactic vasopressor administration on peri-intubation outcomes.
Keywords: airway management; critical care; hypotension; intratracheal intubation; mechanical ventilation; vasoconstrictor agents.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Fuchita received a departmental seed grant from the University of Colorado, Department of Anesthesiology, for biostatistical support. Dr. Casey was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (K23HL153584). Dr. Semler was supported in part by the NIH (K23HL143053). The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Taboada M, Doldan P, Calvo A, et al. : Comparison of tracheal intubation conditions in operating room and intensive care unit: A prospective, observational study. Anesthesiology 2018; 129:321–328 - PubMed
-
- Griesdale DE, Bosma TL, Kurth T, et al. : Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:1835–1842 - PubMed
-
- Green RS, Edwards J, Sabri E, et al. : Evaluation of the incidence, risk factors, and impact on patient outcomes of postintubation hemodynamic instability. CJEM 2012; 14:74–82 - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
